Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Summichum/Archive

11 May 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

User:Summichum has opened another account after being blocked and resumed his editing by the name of Spenceroodi may be he has another account, I would request Callanecc to check this user for soc-puppetry.Rukn950 (talk) 11:26, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

This User Summichum had dragged me to the SPI when he himself was indulged in socpuppetry Ref:Sockpuppet investigations/Rukn950

"Bring to the notice of User:Anupmehra, User:Qwfp and admin User:Crisco 1492 that a significant damage has been already made, in that because of this clear case of meat puppetry (atleast) one editor User:Summichum was judged wrongly and even blocked. Please take corrective action against the offenders and the main dispute article should be reverted back to the stable version which is well cited :[1]Spenceroodi (talk) 07:14, 8 May 2014 (UTC)"

 Jezebel's  Ponyo ,Callanecc, User:Crisco 1492,In the above statement he present himself as another user and after my request to check sock-puppetry of user summichum he has mentioned in userpage of Spenceroodi. that he is summichum.I would request all the user and concerned Editors and Admin to notice this persons dubious behavior. and dragging me to this investigation when he himself is at fault.strict action should be taken against this user. I dont know how many additional sockpuppet accout this user has.Rukn950 (talk) 12:02, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Summichum is blocked third time and was also warned for his disruptive edits at Dawoodi Bohra;


 * Result: Summichum is already blocked two weeks per an earlier report. He is now warned that, if he will not wait for consensus on Dawoodi Bohra topics, he may be indefinitely blocked. EdJohnston (talk) 15:09, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Even after been warned he engaged in disruptive edit by using another account, that of Spenceroodi and possibly above mentioned users.

'proof: Please see the Time and dates of the edits. '
 * my request: I would request check on User:Summichum for sock-puppetry and also review on all the related talkpages for his SPA.Rukn950 (talk) 08:51, 8 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Spenceroodi's Diff: 09:23, 8 May 2014 (diff | hist) . . (+283)‎ . . N User:Spenceroodi ‎ (←Created page with 'Hi, I am Summichum, this is my new account ,I was blocked due to error in judgement as I am a victim of sock puppetry as proven from the investigations here: [h...') (current) [rollback] [vandalism]

Diff:

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Please refer :, Here Summichum has started investigation on Rukn950 and made allegation on many editors including me( Md iet). When accidentally I saw my name referred in this investigation page, I got socked and started reading the page and replied as I could. On my reply this fellow summichum again remarked in the name of Spenceroodi as below:

“ Dear CallaneccThe above group of users specially Md iet indulge in meat puppetry and got me blocked as they were pushing their POV promoting mufaddal as the 53rd dai by re -editing bohra articles to name Mufaddal as 53rd dai even though he is just a  first claimant, it is well known that the stroke ridden debilitated body of burhanuddin was used by his son and his family to orchestrate a sucession ceremony as burhanuddin was even not able to speak , when these people can use their own fathers body to fake a sucession ceremony at large scale fooling thosaunds present, than you can expect they can also come here on wikipedia and promote their propoganda that Mufaddal is the 53rd dai, whereas we know that the main contention is that the body of burhanuddin was used to stage a succession ceremony while he himself was in comatose state with serious mental deficits. This is also the main premise of the 700 page petition filed in bombay high court. This also falls in human rights and patient rights violation and burhanuddin, a seriously ill patient was flown in from london to stage a succession ceremony, knowing well that the body of the patient could not speak or move hence wont object to what is being done on him. Also I dont support either claimants but this should not mean that any one side should declare themselves as 53rd dai when the matter is so controversial and full of malicious elements who wanted to reach the throne by any means possible even if it involves using a comatose bodySpenceroodi (talk) 09:20, 10 May 2014 (UTC).”

This fellow Summichum is blocked for two weeks and warned for not disrupting Dawoodi bohra related case, had started his activity again in the name of Spenceroodi, as clearly shown in the proof presented above. He has himself accepted for being operative in the name of second account after issue  being  raised by Rukn. When this fellow cannot even wait for few days and started operating with other names, how can we accept him to behave in Wikipedian manner.

, seems not suspected being used as sockpuppet.

Regarding Summichum:

Sorry for writing too much, but may please sustain me and my English for wiki sake. The above comments written by this gentleman (even after getting blocked for similar reasons) about a community and its late spiritual head is just  shocking and humiliating complete community  as whole, as these are pure OR of his own. Wiki is so much bothered about its individual editors that its ‘edit warring’ over rule individual ‘genuine rights’. He has mentioned ‘to orchestrate a sucession ceremony’,  ‘use their own fathers body to fake a sucession ceremony at large scale fooling thosaunds’,  and  ‘stage a succession ceremony while he himself was in comatose state with serious mental deficits’  are comments nowhere available in any reports. This fellow is correlating medical reports referred in media for  London medical 4th june incident,  to ceremony which was conducted after a long duration in Mumbai. There is no use of phrase like : ‘orchestrate’, ‘own fathers body’, ‘large scale fooling’, ‘stage a succession’ anywhere in any reports. This fellow confess that he is not from the community then why he is so adamant to favour one claimaint and don’t want to even see any well cited comment about other claimaint. He has gone to the extent that he blamed complete Dawoodi Bohra community to ‘have invented their own religion and mainstream Islam does not recognize them as Muslims’. This allegation is a propoganda material being remarked on a stage like Wiki. The use of this platform is not at all acceptable. Whereas DB claims for representing  Fatimid  and follow Daim ul Islam as their basic  guiding principles.

This user now blaming me for ‘indulge in meat puppetry’ to humilate me, but he is not aware that by  continuing propaganda for forcing his POV with other name he is violating Wiki principles and  Wiki rules are such framed that you cannot escape. Myself is not much bothered about forcing fact/truth as it will be open one day or other  through Wiki reliable sources, and it will prevail. What I am bothered is false propaganda and use of Wiki platform for the purpose, which is not at all acceptable to me. I have declared myself as DB now and my intentions were made clear even when I joined Wiki 5-6 years back to made known Fatimid related topics and improve them with help of others to wiki norms. Earlier I was many edit on good faith basis hoping that fellow editor will help me in getting proper citation. But after this ssuccession dispute incident, I came to know that why Wiki has made so many rules, and how people can use this platform for their purpose.

Regarding Rukn 950:

I don’t want to comment against admin decision of blocking him, but I feel that he has also accepted being DB, and his intentions seems to be  similar to me ,respecting Wiki. He is old Wikidian, and I also started believing him on his approach, taking help from Anup Mehra and pushing facts in consensus manner, but he seems to believe on good faith editing like me. It is very much punching if any true Wikipedian is even warned, but people being blocked repeatedly in short span are very difficult to be taken care off. But I have confidence that Wiki rules are sufficient to handle it, and wiki platform cannot be used for forcing POV. Thanks again for patience hearing.--Md iet (talk) 07:49, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
As mentioned above, the Spenceroodi account has stated on its user page that it is a block-evading sockpuppet account of Summichum, so, unsurprisingly, FreeRangeFrog has blocked Spenceroodi indefinitely. Since it looks 100% as though that claim of sockpuppetry is valid, I have increased Summichum's block by 5 days. Tiptoethrutheminefield does not look to me like the same person. I see nothing in the IP editing to suggest that it is the same person. In fact, it seems likely that the IP editor is the same one who has also used other closely related IP addresses, and is clearly someone who disagrees with Summichum. I see no more to be done here, but I am leaving this case open to allow a clerk to assess the request for CheckUser. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 08:23, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Closing this case without endorsing for checkuser as I see no evidence that Tiptoe or the IP are socks of Summichum. The actual sock has already been dealt with. Someguy1221 (talk) 22:28, 19 May 2014 (UTC)