Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sun05061981/Archive

Evidence submitted by A p3rson
User(s) have repeditively vandalized the same article (does not comply with user's POV). This is shown mainly by the page history, the user's IP talk page, the SP talk page,the SP's edit history, the IP's edits (1, 2). Has created more than one account, using IP, and vandalizes in the same method, removing the same portion. Request also posted at AIV, and page protect request at RPP. Checkuser should be needed, to prove the fact that both accounts are linked, and that the account has been from both IP's. A p 3 rson  ‽   02:36, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by A p 3 rson  ‽   02:36, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

It would be bad to release information about the IP of the editor. I admit there is significant behavioral evidence here, but that's about all we should need to go on anyway. It is obvious that all of these edits are vandalism in nature and thus should be treated as such. Whether these are sockpuppets or meatpuppets is mostly irrelevant. There is no need to look up this information. -- Sh i r ik ( Questions or Comments? ) 02:48, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Blocked all listed. Not tagged. Blocking is on the grounds of vandalism. Regardless of the connection between these editors, the editing is still disruptive. I would like to point out that I am strongly convinced that at least one of the IP editors is not a sockpuppet, though it may be related in another manner. -- Sh i r ik ( Questions or Comments? ) 02:53, 9 June 2010 (UTC)