Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sunderland Renaissance/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
Sole edit left a comment at User talk:Sunderland Renaissance‎ complaining about the block. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 15:04, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


 * I was skeptical about the coherent/directed nature of these at first but then I remembered 222.107.137.78 which had reverted significant chunk of my work overnight. Sure enough it falls in the same area. Horse Eye&#39;s Back (talk) 15:35, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Found another (211.193.32.36), this one is actually from a bit back... June of this year, so this isn't new and we might be missing a lot of edits here. One thing to note is that on that page the IP appears to be a Sockpuppet investigations/Ineedtostopforgetting duck opening up the possibility that this might not be Sunderland Renaissance at all. Horse Eye&#39;s Back (talk) 20:27, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
 * There is an IP who edited Sunderland Renaissance's talk page that asked Sunderland Renaissance to take Horse Eye's back to ANI. That IP was later blocked as a vpn proxy and appears to be registered to the same company in the same country as many of the IPs above. Checkuser obviously cannot comment here, but it is no coincidence that there are VPNs in this range that are all involved with Sunderland Renaissance in some way. Given the history here, the user may have a bone to pick with Horse Eye's Back, and behaviorally these IPs are acting quite sus. —  Red-tailed hawk (nest) 19:15, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The non-stale IPs all belong to the same VPN service, I have blocked as such. I'd also say the behavioral link is pretty clear here. GeneralNotability (talk) 01:33, 30 September 2022 (UTC)