Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sunlight14/Archive

Evidence submitted by JD554
Sunlight14 originally created an article at Amén, which has subsequently been nominated for deletion at Articles for deletion/Amén. Since then Sunlight14 has attempted to recreate the article at Amen (band of Peru) and created a redirect from Marcello Motta. When these articles were redirected, 84.226.241.93 attempted to recreate the articles at these pages as well as stating they were his/her articles here and here. Transittrain then recreated the original article Amen (Peru) and then redirect Marcello Motta to it. Sunlight14, Transittrain and 84.226.241.93 have not edited any article that is not related to Amén. JD554 (talk) 13:57, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Adding IP 89.217.203.15 which appears to be being used by Needsexperts.--JD554 (talk) 18:58, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Adding. Removed AfD-template from Amén on May 29 (warning). Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 04:26, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Adding Annannaaa who recently recreated substantially the same article at Amen (band of Peru) and the IP 89.217.132.239 which immediately started to edit the new article. --JD554 (talk) 11:15, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Summernow has now recreated the same article at Marcello Motta and Amen.--JD554 (talk) 18:42, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Magna14 has now recreated the same identical article at Amen (Peruvian band) with the usual redirect from Marcello Motta. --JD554 (talk) 15:21, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users
Also suspect is magnius (talk) 12:37, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Blocked and tagged the accounts. Leaving open to see if anyone can figure out anything to do with the IPs. It looks like too broad of a range to me.&mdash;Kww(talk) 16:00, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

It appears that all the IPs belong to a corporate building, but the range for all of the them is bigger than a reasonable amount. Unfortunately, we probably will just have to block the socks as we see them. The IPs appear to be dynamic, so there's no use in blocking the individual one's at this point. Icestorm815 •  Talk  00:23, 13 June 2010 (UTC)