Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SuperPacMan/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

All three accounts make the same accusations of conflict of interest, and support that alleged conflict of interest with same guesses of identities of others disagreeing with them. Of course if there were evidence for these allegations it would make sense that different people would come to same conclusion, but the allegations of the "true" identity of other editors is based on individuals these three accounts seem to know as the people they are trying to out are not public figures. The odds that 3 different IP users would all just guess that another user is someone they know seems unlikely. Manner of speech among accounts is very similar. The discussion revolves more around personal attacks then it does any facts, and the particular personal attacks are almost identical. The two IPs can seen to come from the same city, as for the original account I cant give personal information here but I believe if you look into who the original account belongs to you'll see he also comes from the same city. I find it unlikely 3 people from the same city who claim not to know each happen to have so much in common. All three users edits are on the same theme of either supporting business interests of one individual in particular, or a vendetta against that same individual's long standing obsessions. I apologize for the vagueness of this statement as the details would out the person. If I can be given instruction on how to back this up with details without breaking the outing rule I will gladly do so. SnowflakeFury (talk) 18:43, 20 August 2017 (UTC) SnowflakeFury (talk) 18:43, 20 August 2017 (UTC)


 * I added user:2600:387:1:803:0:0:0:C3 to the list because it seemed like they came out of nowhere and removed my good faith edits. I cleaned up the list of names on and article, moving notable names to the top.  I also added a person that was forgotten for some reason. Datagod (talk) 05:37, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

These users seem more interested in tying other users back to someone they choose to have a grudge with than improving Wikipedia. They then deflect concerns of their own conflicts of interest by doing something like this, along with extreme reaches of logic. Since they cannot defend their vandalization and edits made in favor of their freinds over factual information, they extend to trying to report accounts.

I'm confident no connection witll be found with whom they claim, as there is not one. I have no relation to their source of obsession, I am simply one of several editors that have tried to improved Wiki artices on many subjects where there was a need.

They seem more interested in idenfiying people instead of proper edits, attempting to make things personal while making things personal. I'll continue my work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.86.114.4 (talk) 02:11, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * without the filer providing any diffs there's not much I can do here. The supposed master is not sanctioned and hasn't edited in over two years, so I can't see how anything happening here would be considered sockpuppetry, thus I'm closing this. normally private evidence can be emailed to the Arbitration Committee, but you'll need to have a stronger case than what you've provided here for the Committee to be able to do anything. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:02, 24 August 2017 (UTC)