Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Superkeegan9100/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Presumed block evasion; seems to be editing similar pages and continuing to use unsourced/invalid sourced content. Their replacement of Superkeegan's user page with "THIS ACCOUNT IS DEAD" is an implication that the user is associated with or is, this indefinitely blocked user. ViperSnake151  Talk  16:09, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

IP has restored edits by sockmaster that were previously reverted -. Electric Burst (Electron firings)(Zaps) 01:28, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Making the same kinds of edits to the same sorts of articles. Restored Superkeegan9100's edit to Cartoonito here. Sro23 (talk) 14:20, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * The retaliatory edit summaries also seem to suggest a connection. ViperSnake151   Talk  04:38, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Sock ✅. --  Amanda  (aka DQ) 18:20, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Sock blocked, IPs have gone quiet. I'm calling this one, closing and archiving. Courcelles (talk) 04:47, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Made two edits with shouting edit summaries,, a common behavior for the banned user Nate Speed. When he was reverted, he goes to Ponyo's talk page to request block of the reverter and issues a bogus vandalism warning. Unsure if this needs a CheckUser or not, but IMO it might be needed. theinstantmatrix (talk) 21:57, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Sro23 is right, and I've crossed out my CU comment, as the interaction analyzer made it more obvious that Mike Littlejohn and Superkeegan9100 were editing the same articles. theinstantmatrix (talk) 22:40, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I am 99% sure this isn't Nate Speed. However, the shouting edit summaries reminded me of this sockmaster. See also editor interaction analyser. Sro23 (talk) 22:25, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
 * See my comment on their talk page. I've blocked for three months for IP socking. The following accounts were pulled out of the same ranges but not using the same device:
 * The first four accounts here were created one after the other in a couple of minutes
 * The first four accounts here were created one after the other in a couple of minutes
 * The first four accounts here were created one after the other in a couple of minutes
 * The first four accounts here were created one after the other in a couple of minutes
 * The first four accounts here were created one after the other in a couple of minutes

— Berean Hunter   (talk)  21:55, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Closing. I can't really see a behavioral connection between Mike Littlejohn and the other accounts since hardly any of them edited, but regardless, everyone is blocked. Sro23 (talk) 21:15, 27 January 2018 (UTC)