Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Supersaiyen312/Archive

27 June 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

On 2014 FIFA World Cup I have had some debate with this user regarding unilaterally deleting a significant part of the article, and when I mentioned the wp:3RR the new user Lenems who has less than 50 edits showed up and repeated the undo/delete edits of the previous user. The first user seems to have been blocked and did have some previous issues with 3RR. Nergaal (talk) 17:25, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
 * And no, I'm not blocked and have no problems with 3RR. Though there were issues in the past, just like you. Supersaiyen312 (talk) 20:02, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
 * PS: this is the first time I am doing this so sorry if I am missing any steps. Nergaal (talk) 17:26, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Very mature, I told you to get off my page so you decide to open this instead. Considering Lenems created an account 4 months ago, I wouldn't call that "new". If you haven't noticed, the page in question is getting a ton of traffic and views right now. I said the reason for my removal of the subsection and because there was already an article for it along with cases just like it. It's not exactly notable here like this example. You reverted it, writing in your incomprehensible English, with the reasoning being " this guys probably deserves a read card for this edit ". You're also pretty hypocritical, considering you violated the 3RR x2, offering no good reasonings. Supersaiyen312 (talk) 19:55, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Then I am sure you have noting to be worried about. Nergaal (talk) 21:03, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
 * That's all you got? Yeah, I don't have anything to worry to about, so nice try. Supersaiyen312 (talk) 02:36, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.'' This seems extremely frivolous. Both accounts are pretty new. One is more active than the other. They have both been actively editing non-stop since their first edit. The 2014 FIFA World Cup is a major current international sporting event -- the major current international sporting event -- and one good-faith user stumbling upon a dispute involving two other good-faith users and joining in is not only possible, it's probable.

Note I'm not saying that these two users are NOT the same user. I'm saying User:Nergaal should provide more evidence.

Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 15:31, 28 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Again, I am not sure how this process works. Before the undo edits yesterday Lenems has only ~30 edits between May 20 and May 24 this year. Then his first edit is do repeat the same undo that Supersaiyen312 did multiple times, right after I mentioned to Supersaiyen312 the 3RR rules. The second undo that Lenems did has the summary as "per aforementioned reasons", presumably Supersaiyen312's. Nergaal (talk) 16:01, 28 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Considering you were reverting nonstop without discussing it at all (at the time), another user saw and reverted you. You're also pretty hypocritical, and like said above, you should include more evidence. The article is getting a ton of traffic and views right now. Lenems also joined 5 months ago (on another wiki, not the English (en) one). Go ahead and, please, use checkuser, I endorse it. You won't find anything. Nice try Nergaal and you are disparate. Supersaiyen312 (talk) 17:57, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * No proper evidence presented. Only a content dispute with several users involved. Take the content dispute to the proper noticeboards, and stop the drama. -- DQ   (ʞlɐʇ)  03:08, 6 July 2014 (UTC)