Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Surappagari/Archive

12 May 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

This user has been removing speedy deletion tags from the page Prayukti, an article which they authored. Upon being rebuked for it (four warnings now), they logged out and began editing under the IP address User:150.129.121.88 and again attempting to remove the speedy deletion template. Now, they appear to have created a second single-purpose account under Monteraj to do the same thing. ~ Erick Shepherd  • ( Talk ) • 20:30, 12 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Update: This user appears to have created a third account under the name Sairam9333 and has recreated the same page, Prayukti, following its speedy deletion and a block being placed on their primary account, Surappagari. ~ Erick Shepherd  • ( Talk ) • 03:48, 13 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Update: Another account and IP — Akanksha.sweet and 103.48.67.20 — exhibiting the exact same pattern of removing the speedy deletion template and spamming the talk page with contested deletion messages. ~ Erick Shepherd  • ( Talk ) • 11:43, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I have added User:Samvinnsrock and User:Pradeepthimarri who recreated the Prayukti page. The master is blocked for using Wikipedia for spam or advertising purposes, the other accounts are all blocked and tagged as sockpuppets. Typically, we do not block IPs for more than a few days and as these have not edited for two or three days, I am disinclined to block them now. There is nothing more to be done here, I think. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:21, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

More   Chrissymad  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  16:08, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Accounts to compare against can be found in the history of the deleted Prayukti article. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 03:22, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Wenaih and Santhosh cumaur are ✅ from each other. I've blocked them both and tagged them as suspected socks of Surappagari.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 17:53, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Yet more Prayukti spam. Pretty identical to the last creation...can we also get some salt? This has been deleted 12 times and gone through an AfD. CHRISSY MAD ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  12:49, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Page slated by and user  Amortias (T)(C) 19:50, 2 April 2017 (UTC)