Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sushilxxx/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Both users have the same username, are editing in the same area and creating promotional articles. The master created recently created Rajja Rani a film directed by Yam Thapa which was created by the suspected sock and if you look at and  both looks exactly same. The master uploaded this image as own work and used in Aaryan Adhikari which was created by Sushil.lax. As per the summary of the file, it was clicked on 7 June 2018 the same day Sushil.lax created this article so this looks like a case of UPE. GSS (talk |c|em ) 18:35, 10 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Adding who are editing in the same area and Binodbhagat creating the same kind of promotional BLPs. Bisshh who was registered back in 2011  two weeks ago where he added some awards and then after reading my nomination where I raised a concern that the awards are not verifiable he uploaded this image of the subject Nirajan Pradhan holding a trophy and a certificate and surprisingly as per the summary of the file the image was created/clicked a day before it was uploaded (9 June 2018). Binod.gr whose last edit anywhere on Wikipedia was in June last year suddenly appeared and  from the same article Nirajan Pradhan (created by Binodbhagat) with the comment  and  this source today which was published recently and has Alexa rank of 13,870 in Nepal and 6,706,501 globally and I'm wondering how he found this link within 24 hours it was published, so as per their behaviour they look related to the master and Sushil.lax if not then definitely to each other also, if possible please compare this group with Sockpuppet investigations/NepaliHelper. Lalitasthapradhan has the same last name as the subject and was registered a day after the article Nirajan Pradhan was created. Thank you GSS  (talk |c|em ) 12:19, 12 June 2018 (UTC) (updated GSS  (talk |c|em ) 04:12, 13 June 2018 (UTC))


 * sorry for the delay. I just provided some diff above please take a look. Also, the same day Binod.gr removed the prod from Binodbhagat's article Nirajan Pradhan he posted the same comment on the article talk page that , what he mean by "We" but not yet received any response. Thank you GSS  (talk |c|em ) 04:48, 13 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Update: The master recreated Aaryan Adhikari (earlier created by Sushil.lax) which includes almost the same contents including exactly same "Early life" section so repinging . Thank you. GSS  (talk |c|em ) 14:01, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Obviously the first two (Sushilxxx and Sushil.lax) are ✅. I ran and found him ❌ and i'm not comfortable running more checks without diffs provided as evidence. --  Amanda  (aka DQ) 21:35, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
 * While the following may be related:
 * I would ask the administrator blocking to consider whether or not these could be different people in the same area especially considering the evidence above. There is no relation to Sushilxxx, and their sock. Insufficient evidence to check on the last user. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 03:00, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
 * I would ask the administrator blocking to consider whether or not these could be different people in the same area especially considering the evidence above. There is no relation to Sushilxxx, and their sock. Insufficient evidence to check on the last user. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 03:00, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
 * I would ask the administrator blocking to consider whether or not these could be different people in the same area especially considering the evidence above. There is no relation to Sushilxxx, and their sock. Insufficient evidence to check on the last user. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 03:00, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
 * I would ask the administrator blocking to consider whether or not these could be different people in the same area especially considering the evidence above. There is no relation to Sushilxxx, and their sock. Insufficient evidence to check on the last user. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 03:00, 11 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The two originally confirmed accounts are . Combined with the technical data, the other accounts are too stale to be worth blocking at this time. If they start abusing those accounts again, a new SPI can be filed. Closing. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:21, 11 July 2018 (UTC)