Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Svpcom/Archive

Evidence submitted by Cirt
Thank you for your time. -- Cirt (talk) 23:24, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Accounts used for advocacy and advertising of a company
 * 1) Note the username, "Svpcom", likely stands for: "Senior Vice President of Communications".
 * 2) Svpcom account has made zero other edits other than to advocate on behalf of a company product, EXtremeDB.
 * 3) ExtremeDB was determined to be not notable and spam/advertising/promotion, and was deleted at AFD - Articles for deletion/EXtremeDB.
 * 4) A different account listed this at Deletion Review, result was "Deletion endorsed", see Deletion review/Log/2010 October 13.
 * 5) All of the accounts have a focus of editing solely related to advocacy of EXtremeDB.
 * 6) All of the accounts either have: 1) No userpage, or 2) One-line-entry userpage.
 * Evidence of the listed accounts
 * 1) = only edits are advocacy on behalf of EXtremeDB, see ; Svpcom has no userpage.
 * 2) = only edits are editing the page ExtremeDB, before it was deleted, and then arguing for it not to be deleted, see Special:Contributions/Wellstein and deleted contribs at Special:DeletedContributions/Wellstein. Sole contents of Wellstein's usepage says one-line-entry, "This is Wellstein's user page."
 * 3) = only deleted edits are to page ExtremeDB before it was deleted, see deleted contribs at Special:DeletedContributions/Drachmae. Sole contents of Drachmae's userpage says one-line-entry, "Hi, I'm Drachmae!"
 * 4) = only edits are advocacy to have ExtremeDB undeleted, see contribs at ; TheLadyBug1999 has no userpage.

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 * - NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 00:44, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Drachmae and Wellstein are ✅ as each other. All other accounts are completely ❌. –MuZemike 04:56, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Nod, thank you. I would still submit that the behavioral evidence is strong, connecting all of the above, absent the presence of additional technical confirmation. Will defer to judgment of closing admin about evaluation of the above behavioral evidence. -- Cirt (talk) 05:54, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Closed, Nakon  07:40, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Blocked TheLadyBug1999 and Svpcom based on behavioral evidence presented by Cirt. Nakon  07:46, 2 November 2010 (UTC)