Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Swagsevo/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Both accounts were created in July and solely edited the Frankopan family and Talk:Frankopan family article, edit warring & making it seems there are more editors in the discussion  in regard to the same section "Doimi de Lupis's name claiming", as recently extensively did Lilipo25, who when did not manage to get a consensus continued to edit war until the end of June (almost breaching 3RR ) when the article became protected until 6 July. Seemingly, the editor is unsatisfied with the outcome and instead to follow others advice decided to continue disruptively pushing for the removal & major edit of the section from the article. In addition, the article is generating low views (, note that the peaks are during the dispute between Lilipo25 and me) and it is mostly ignored by other editors, so it is highly suspicious it became of interest for other editors specifically new user accounts. Miki Filigranski (talk) 22:28, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''


 * I don't have any idea how to go about proving it, but this is my ONLY Wikipedia account. It is the only one I have ever had. If there is some process I can go through to prove this, I would be more than happy to participate in it to the fullest extent.


 * Miki is angry with me because I tried to make the Frankopan family article adhere to WP:NPOV and she kept reverting edits to her own extremely biased and defamatory version that attacks the family. Her edit warring and her constant personal attacks on me in violation of WP:PERSONAL were so exasperating that I walked away for nearly a month. The article is still on my Watchlist and I will admit to some amusement at watching someone revert Miki's edits over and over, but they were frankly quite stupid about it and never even gave a reason, which ensured that an admin would simply revert their edits within minutes and block them. They accomplished nothing.


 * I would never waste time making multiple accounts or reverting edits without even giving a reason, knowing it was pointless. This report is Miki being vindictive because I reported her to an admin for repeated personal attacks. Again, anything I can do to prove that I have no sockpuppet accounts, I am more than happy to do do. Just let me know. Lilipo25 (talk) 22:58, 24 July 2019 (UTC)


 * I am half asleep right now, but I just want to add that you are welcome to check my IP addresses and all server logs to investigate my account, if it helps. I have no objection, as long as my private information is kept private. I am unclear if Miki has requested a CHECK, but regardless, I grant permission for a Wikipedia investigator to do a CheckUser search on me without delay. Lilipo25 (talk) 00:52, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I didn't request CheckUser. You did not read well how to defend yourself as you're taking it too personally and making false claims. --Miki Filigranski (talk) 02:44, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I didn't say you did request a CheckUser. I said I was unclear on whether or not you had but whoever investigates these claims is welcome to do a CheckUser on me if it helps them to determine whether or not I have sockpuppet accounts. You made the false claim that I am using sockpuppet accounts - literally MINUTES after I reported you to an admin for the personal attacks today - and I want my name cleared. I have nothing to fear from any investigation, since this is my only Wikipedia account. Lilipo25 (talk) 03:24, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

I can not say that I am a neutral third party, because I also have problems with Miki. But to be honest, this situation looks strange. If you look at the first edits of Miki, they began editing in the highly controversial topic of the Syrian War and demonstrated a too good knowledge of the wiki-rules. For example, in their they mentioned WP:GOODFAITH, reflist, weight, reliable source and so on. I wonder what happened to their previous account. Perhaps they should be checked too?--Nicoljaus (talk) 23:32, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
 * If something's strange then are the two of you. You are jointly commenting on talk pages as a sign of mutual support, and "vendetta" against me, but now, even here? Really? What your comment has to do with this investigation? Why are you making a false accusation? Are you aware that's a WP:PERSONAL attack? I had more than a week between first and second edit, with the first advised by the system itself to start practicing on, and because I saw I did not know enough I read and followed the links at the Help:Contents. Things you're saying are basic knowledge from there, there's nothing advanced. I made a lot of mistakes in the beginning and do even now. I don't understand what's the issue with the Syrian War either? I have a master's degree in political science and of course I will be interested in political events, moreover, 2017 Shayrat missile strike was a significant event and world news for days. Additionally, as a woman, I don't like when my gender is constantly brought up by these two editors, or played with my nickname to sound as male, it is starting to feel uncomfortable as if they have something against me because of my gender. It stinks of Gender bias on Wikipedia, from misogyny, lengthy and hostile edit wars, to disrespect of having lack of free time and else. It is not funny, these provocations are really irritating and unfriendly, no wonder we are not attracted to edit Wikipedia. --Miki Filigranski (talk) 02:44, 25 July 2019 (UTC)


 * WHOA. This is a serious accusation, Miki, with no evidence provided:


 * "as a woman, I don't like when my gender is constantly brought up by these two editors..it's starting to feel uncomfortable as if they have something against me because of my gender. It stinks of Gender bias on Wikipedia#Causes, from misogyny"


 * Miki, I am a woman. I have no idea why you would assume I am a man. I am not. And not once in my life has anyone ever accused hardcore feminist me of "misogyny". That is a major accusation and you must provide evidence, please. Because not only have I not "constantly" brought up your gender, I am fairly certain that I have NEVER brought it up - not once. Please show ONE instance where I have said ANYTHING about your gender. ONE time when I brought it up or spoke about it in any way at all. ONE. I haven't seen the other user do anything of the kind, either.


 * You have literally falsely accused me of sockpuppetry with this whole page, so it's kind of funny that you are now accusing someone else of a WP:PERSONAL attack for suggesting exactly the same about you, don't you think?


 * If you think it's strange that the two of us are both responding to your constant barrage of personal attacks, perhaps you should consider not calling multiple other editors "liars", "pathetic" and "ignorant" on multiple pages at the same time. But personally attacking multiple editors with demeaning names and then crying "they hate me because I'm a woman!" when they respond is not okay. Link to where I have ever said or even hinted at anything related to our shared gender, please. Lilipo25 (talk) 03:24, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * There is insufficient evidence to justify a check of Lilipo25.
 * The following accounts are ✅ to each other:
 * VKLO999! is ❌. the unblocked confirmed accounts.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:49, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Please create a new case with Swagsevo as the master. You can then tag the above accounts. After, please close this case.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:46, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Bbb23 - ✅. I did this by moving the SPI report title from 'Lilipo25' to this page ('Swagsevo') and left a redirect on the other page. Since the Lilipo25 doesn't have any archives or previous SPI cases, renaming instead of creating a new report seemed to be the better option to me. All confirmed accounts have been tagged (including the master). Please let me know if the creation of a separate case is needed for some reason that I missed, and I'll be happy to fix it. Setting this case status to 'closed'.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   10:55, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
 * VKLO999! is ❌. the unblocked confirmed accounts.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:49, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Please create a new case with Swagsevo as the master. You can then tag the above accounts. After, please close this case.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:46, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Bbb23 - ✅. I did this by moving the SPI report title from 'Lilipo25' to this page ('Swagsevo') and left a redirect on the other page. Since the Lilipo25 doesn't have any archives or previous SPI cases, renaming instead of creating a new report seemed to be the better option to me. All confirmed accounts have been tagged (including the master). Please let me know if the creation of a separate case is needed for some reason that I missed, and I'll be happy to fix it. Setting this case status to 'closed'.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   10:55, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
 * VKLO999! is ❌. the unblocked confirmed accounts.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:49, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Please create a new case with Swagsevo as the master. You can then tag the above accounts. After, please close this case.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:46, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Bbb23 - ✅. I did this by moving the SPI report title from 'Lilipo25' to this page ('Swagsevo') and left a redirect on the other page. Since the Lilipo25 doesn't have any archives or previous SPI cases, renaming instead of creating a new report seemed to be the better option to me. All confirmed accounts have been tagged (including the master). Please let me know if the creation of a separate case is needed for some reason that I missed, and I'll be happy to fix it. Setting this case status to 'closed'.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   10:55, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Bbb23 - ✅. I did this by moving the SPI report title from 'Lilipo25' to this page ('Swagsevo') and left a redirect on the other page. Since the Lilipo25 doesn't have any archives or previous SPI cases, renaming instead of creating a new report seemed to be the better option to me. All confirmed accounts have been tagged (including the master). Please let me know if the creation of a separate case is needed for some reason that I missed, and I'll be happy to fix it. Setting this case status to 'closed'.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   10:55, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Yet another recreation of Priyam Chatterjee with almost the same contents and sources. GSS (talk |c|em ) 11:47, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Given the number of socks uncovered by the last check, please check if any more exist now. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:52, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
 * ❌.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:23, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Closing per the above. The SandDoctor  Talk 19:16, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( original case name)

Mohmal.ar is an account which made numerous edits at Draft:Simodmart and Draft:Simodmart (Producer) (same topic despite the different title), but has since been globally locked after being identified on fr as a likely sockpuppet of fr:utilisateur:Simodmart (guess how surprised I'm not) — following which MHMD DM1 showed up, blanked the undisambiguated page (but not the "producer" one) and created yet another duplicate draft about the same person at Draft:Simodmart (Moroccan Pap Producer). Also both users have repeatedly tried to readd the drafts to articlespace categories, despite those categories being repeatedly removed or disabled under WP:DRAFTNOCAT rules. This is probably already sufficient for a block on WP:DUCK grounds, but given the situation I think we should still do a checkuser to scan for sleepers as there were also prior attempts to create the same article about Simodmart by the also globally-locked User:Mohamed El Andam (see also Simodmart's claimed real name in the draft) and User:458f1f34b2. Bearcat (talk) 20:18, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * -  Girth Summit  (blether)  16:20, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅ to, and also to , which is globally locked on meta as a sock of ; here on enwiki, Jaggerisn is blocked as a confirmed sock of . I will move this case there, block all accounts, and request locks. Girth Summit  (blether)  16:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Also noting for the record that MHMDDM is ✅ to, and to a bunch of other globally locked accounts. Girth Summit  (blether)  16:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Recreation of a new draft about Draft:Simodmart (DJ), a topic which has been previously attempted at several different titles by past Swagsevo socks. Bearcat (talk) 15:26, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ to most of the recent batch, particularly . Requested a lock given previous socks. Izno (talk) 18:00, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Closing. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 18:22, 10 February 2023 (UTC)