Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TEOS2011/Archive

12 October 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

WP:DUCK, removal of (as tagged by him) "libellous material". Even if it were libellous, edit-warring and socking is not a justification. Tb hotch .™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions.  22:42, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Since I am 100% sure that I am the only user using this account and this IP to put an end to the unfounded smear campaign on Professor's Phares wikipage - and since I have no idea who is TEOS2011, although we apparently share the same values of keeping Wikipedia's integrity by not letting it become a platform for cheap defamation,

I hope the administrators will take into account this erroneous claim of Sockpuppetry to determine that those who filed it have the same ill intentions when they try to edit Professor's Phares info with distorted facts from unknown sources. JD (talk) 06:15, 13 October 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by JudgeDred1975 (talk • contribs) 23:24, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Sorry, I find the behavioral evidence strong enough to warrant a check. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 01:13, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Looks ❌. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 04:33, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Hm, alright. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 23:52, 13 October 2011 (UTC)