Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tachyon1010101010/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Accounts showed up after User:Joe6pack was blocked as an WP:SPA. Both accounts appear to be similar WP:SPAs advocating on behalf of Robert Sungenis. jps (talk) 20:19, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * This is my first time defending myself in a page like this so forgive me if I make a mistake on the proper format. I am not committing sock puppetry. I'm not in communication with other editors. Assuming good faith was ignored in my situation.Tachyon1010101010 (talk) 06:58, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Please remember to check userlogs before filing cases; the listed alleged sock is, in fact, several months older than the accused master. I've moved the case accordingly, but have not yet evaluated the evidence. GABgab 17:52, 20 February 2017 (UTC)


 * - There's definitely enough here for at least a check. The SPAing is pretty suggestive. I've also placed a DS alert for the unblocked user. Thanks, Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) 23:58, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
 * The accounts appear to be ❌ to each other. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 00:25, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Closing with no action. This may be meatpuppetry, but there's not enough to make that determination. It could just as easily be two SPAs, since they aren't pushing exactly the same issues as far as I can tell, and they have a few differences in editing patterns. They also both go back years. WP:ANI would be the appropriate venue to discuss disruptive editing related to the unblocked SPA. ~ Rob 13 Talk 07:16, 24 February 2017 (UTC)