Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Taimurijaz97/Archive

10 December 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

The editing patterns and interests of both the user accounts are same. It is obvious that the user has evaded block in violation of the policy.  SAMI  talk 15:31, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * While a better presentation of evidence would be nice, I was able to find what I needed to run the check, and call this one ✅. Courcelles 22:53, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
 * All taken care of. Mike V  •  Talk  05:11, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

18 December 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

This account was created a day after the blockade of his sock-puppet account TJ47. Editing pattern and interest are alike.  SAMI  talk 19:43, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * There are some similarities, such as creating articles about universities in Pakistan. 1, 2, 3, 4
 * It would be most helpful if you could provide some diffs when you file future cases. It helps establish a behavioral link between the accounts and helps the SPI team evaluate your case in a timely fashion. There are quite a number of cases and only so few of us. :) Mike V  •  Talk  18:27, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I would follow your instructions next time.  SAMI  talk 20:58, 19 December 2014 (UTC)


 * The following account is :
 * . PhilKnight (talk) 19:04, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
 * . PhilKnight (talk) 19:04, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

09 January 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

As with previous socks, created right after the previous was blocked (Dec 20), and with same area of focus, Pakistani colleges (where many have been deleted for one reason or another). Editing style is also similar, compare National Testing Service (where both users edited) with Balochistan Testing Service from Absa, File:SBBU-SBA-Logo.jpeg from T with File:Alhamd-Logo.jpg from A. Crow  Caw  23:58, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
. Enough behavioral evidence to warrant a CU, although actual diffs would have been helpful, .--Bbb23 (talk) 21:48, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
 * is ✅ and now . PhilKnight (talk) 23:10, 10 January 2015 (UTC)