Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tammy Levy/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

All accounts are used to do similar wikiwashing on SpotOption. Note deletion of identical Bureau of Investigative Journalism content in 5 out of 6 diffs below: Note that one or more of these accounts have claimed to be associated with SpotOption corporate marketing. See Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 111 for details. Bri (talk) 21:41, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
 * 93.157.86.35 - "As the VP Marketing director of the company, only my description should be valid."
 * Tammy Levy - "damaging"
 * Delphine1611 - "libel and hearsay"
 * 93.157.86.33 - numerous unexplained deletions incl.
 * Spotoption - "Chnged by the marketing department of Spotoption"
 * 84.108.238.253 - deletions incl. "false and misleading info"

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Closed for the lack of evidence. Also, all accounts and IPs are .  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:33, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Requesting this check before the CU data goes out of scope around the end of this week.


 * The master is connected with the company's marketing department as described in Times of Israel investigative journalism: "Tammy Levy [is] SpotOption's director of marketing"
 * Both users Spotoption and Delphine1611 also have deleted a statement by (real-world) Tammy Levy from the article
 * User Spotoption identifies herself as "the marketing department of Spotoption", i.e. Tammy Levy
 * The two users Spotoption and Delphine1611 have made near identical changes to the SpotOption infobox, the latter returning to the article after user Spotoption was blocked.

There's good reason to look at available CU data, as this article has been an ongoing nexus of COI editing as described in the now-archived 30 April SPI request. ☆ Bri (talk) 15:28, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  10:16, 26 July 2017 (UTC) — Berean Hunter   (talk)  00:14, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
 * - to determine between meats or socks.
 * The master is . The two newer accounts appear to be ❌. Salvio Let's talk about it! 22:21, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Nothing else to do. Closing.

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Generally promotional edits to the same article, indistinguishable from the // group. Especially glaring is citation to SpotOption marketing material (then vs now), agressive reversion of other editors as before (then vs now), and finally an appeal to other editors to reintroduce promotion. ☆ Bri (talk) 16:42, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Continued edit warring over promotional material on the same article? . Please block this account indefinitely. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:25, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * , closing. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:59, 23 October 2017 (UTC)