Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tanbircdq/Archive

19 June 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

On 3 november Tanbircdq and YousufMiah started to edit the same article . Then here both of them are editing in same day. Also here they started to edit this articles for deletion in same day. here and here they did the same thing in "Rizwan hussain's line". Here and here They are are editing on similar issue. Finally yousuf miah here is continuing to do the same thing as he did before with tanbircdq. I also know that sometime these two sockpuppets use different IPs. Wuosk (talk) 13:51, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
Of course that both them are sockpuppets. Please look those talk page's history. I can't believe. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14. I do not understand why they aren't blocked?

These 2 accounts are confirmed, thank to WP:CHK. They should be blocked as early as possible. Wuosk (talk) 17:17, 3 July 2014 (UTC)


 * I have no intention of disputing my use of two accounts nor do I wish to justify this with excuses, I can only offer my sincerest apologies for this. My only defence is one of mitigation for the time and effort I have spent contributing to improve various projects over the years and that my general editing activity has been in good-faith. Therefore, I plead that any punishment delivered against me is a lenient one.


 * As for Wuosk, I can see that you have taken my comments about some of your 10s of SPAs here personally and you have now developed a vendetta to get me blocked. Tanbircdq (talk) 19:30, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

However, these 2 accounts are confirmed and they should be blocked. 109.154.1.192 (talk) 08:22, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - - Per evidence presented, user compare report is compelling. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:23, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
 * and are ✅. PhilKnight (talk) 20:18, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I've swapped the two accounts (moved the page and swapped the listing above) given that Tanbircdq is more well established. Before taking any action I'm going to give Tanbircdq the opportunity to explain. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 14:13, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The editor who opened this report is a confirmed sock of Sockpuppet investigations/Aldota.--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:57, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I've blocked and tagged the sock but I don't plan on taking any action on at this stage. However Tanbircdq is warned that if they caught socking again it is extremely likely that they'll be blocked indefinitely with little chance of unblock after this warning. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:28, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

21 May 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

86.154.254.204
 * This IP reinserted material ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yisrael_Katz_%28politician,_born_1955%29&diff=prev&oldid=716228431]) to the article on the Israeli politician Yisrael Katz (politician, born 1955) identical to that previously inserted by Tanbircdq ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yisrael_Katz_%28politician,_born_1955%29&diff=694345085&oldid=694252678]) some months prior, and which had been rejected by other editors.
 * IP is clearly not an inexperienced editor, pinging multiple editors that they knew in advance were likely to have views favorable to their own ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Yisrael_Katz_%28politician,_born_1955%29&diff=prev&oldid=717026778][//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring&diff=prev&oldid=718274443]), issuing a templated user warning ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Caseeart&diff=prev&oldid=718245258]) and submitting a well formed edit warring report to the correct forum ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring&diff=prev&oldid=718274443]). Tanbircdq files such reports to gain an advantage in content disputes fairly frequently.
 * IP shares Tanbircdq's preoccupation with "censorship" and the idea that material is being "censored" by other editors. IP: [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring&diff=prev&oldid=718286521][//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring&diff=prev&oldid=718291191][//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Yisrael_Katz_(politician,_born_1955)&diff=717637102&oldid=717632436][//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Yisrael_Katz_(politician,_born_1955)&diff=718076314&oldid=718076052][//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Yisrael_Katz_(politician,_born_1955)&diff=718244709&oldid=718175077]; Tanbircdq: [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Yisrael_Katz_(politician,_born_1955)&diff=694345688&oldid=688763256][//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Yisrael_Katz_(politician,_born_1955)&diff=719768365&oldid=718450820][//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard&diff=720234829&oldid=720158167]
 * IP made a WP:POINT edit to remove unfavorable material on the article of Naz Shah, a British politican: [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Naz_Shah&diff=718955131&oldid=718946303][//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Naz_Shah&diff=719271011&oldid=719044115]. This is in line with Tanbircdq's general interest in British political figures - particularly left-wing, or Labour Party ones of Muslim heritage. Indeed, Tanbircdq came some days later and added maintenence templates to the very same article: [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Naz_Shah&diff=720233854&oldid=719633605]

2A02:C7D:3FDE:D400:34AC:583A:B24A:5AF3
 * This IP canvassed various editors considered likely to be supportive of Tanbircdq and the other IP's agenda: Special:Contributions/2A02:C7D:3FDE:D400:34AC:583A:B24A:5AF3. It too complains about "censorship" in the canvassing notices.

I also have additional evidence that will have to be emailed. To whom should I send it? AnotherNewAccount (talk) 21:45, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Master blocked for 5 days because of the deliberate logged-out editing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:31, 27 May 2016 (UTC)