Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tannerslaught/Archive

15 February 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

At Articles for deletion/Ariane Bellamar, each of these accounts, which were created in rapid succession within an hour, voted to keep the article in question, repeating the arguments of Tannerslaught:
 * Tannerslaught:
 * Clintonwallace0813:


 * Tannerslaught:
 * Mushu2:


 * Tannerslaught:
 * Wikipuffer48: NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:50, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The following accounts are ✅:
 * Blocked, tagged (in a moment), closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 05:27, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged (in a moment), closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 05:27, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged (in a moment), closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 05:27, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged (in a moment), closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 05:27, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged (in a moment), closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 05:27, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged (in a moment), closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 05:27, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

21 February 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Quack, quack. Account appears suddenlyduring a deletion discussion that saw several other confirmed socks participate, and with its first edit explicitly claims to be a new user and totally not a sock account, then waits several days before reemerging to restore the deleted page after the AFD closed. Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 13:47, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I originally made a dog's dinner of this, as I didn't see the (collapsed) instructions for opening a new SPI. (I could have sworn this used to be easier...) I copy-pasted my original signature to keep the date for the archive. Should I delete the original? Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 06:48, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
 * By the way, in the intervening time between when I first tried to file this SPI and now, the recreated page has been deleted, so non-admins, myself included, can't see the most-damning pieces of evidence anymore. Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 06:52, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Highly . Add behavoir and I can smell the dirty laundry 2 blocks away (and I'm someone who can't actually smell). I've blocked and tagged. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 07:23, 22 February 2016 (UTC)