Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Taraneh Javanbakht/Archive

Evidence submitted by Kurdo777
The puppeteer is the same person as Taraneh Javanbakht. By using these sock-poppets, she is violating WP:COI and WP:NOT. The suspected socks are used for self-promotion, e.g., netism (now redirected to another article) and editing Taraneh Javanbakht. All the users are involved in Taraneh Javanbakht, which makes the page an auto-biography. Furthermore, the users in question are engaged in vote-stacking on in AFDs related to the subject. Articles_for_deletion/Taraneh_Javanbakht_%282nd_nomination%29

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by Kurdo777 (talk) 01:01, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

– I can say right now that Taraneh Javanbakht is completely and that only Zohairani is the only user who participated in that AFD. Otherwise, all the accounts' edits are all over the place. You're going to need more evidence showing possible sockpuppetry besides the two having a similar username and one participating in an AFD that has the word "Javanbahkt" in it. –MuZemike 03:44, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Actually, User:Javanbakht is not stale, she has edited recently. And User:Javanbakht has stated in her talk page that she is Taraneh Javanbakht . So if that account does match User:Zohairani and the IP, she is violation of WP:COI. --Kurdo777 (talk) 05:56, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
 * There are three users here. and  are .  is not stale. Both participated in the AfD, Zohairani  arguing for keep and Javanbakht requesting deletion as the subject. Is there any evidence of sockpuppetry other than the fact that both participated? Timotheus Canens (talk) 09:30, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
 * This can be archived, I am withdrawing the request. Thanks. --Kurdo777 (talk) 22:39, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

per user request. –MuZemike 04:31, 18 January 2010 (UTC)