Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tasbian/Archive

Note
It has since come to light that this user and User:DavidYork71 are the same person. Please file repeat violations at Sockpuppet investigations/DavidYork71 Orderinchaos 13:49, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Orderinchaos
Rather strange single-purpose accounts emerging from the Australia – New Zealand relations article and related, and some odd behaviour at Articles_for_deletion/List_of_Australia-New_Zealand_and_Australasia_topics. Listii was created on 24 March at 10:09 UTC and only edited on 24 March, DutchUvven was created on 25 March and only edited on 25 March, and the two IPs have interleaving edits suggesting they are the same person. (Added later: Temulag appears to be the 26 March incarnation.) The 212 address, although in Russia, appears to be a proxy service - it resolves to "tproxy.http.nic.ru", which is apparently blacklisted on one service (see ). The editing pattern suggests similarities to a former user Tasbian, who was blocked for 55 hours under the Scientology arbitration case for disruptive editing at 06:32 UTC, four hours before Listii's creation. I have added "A" and "E" as, if the link is confirmed, this user is avoiding an ArbCom sanction. Orderinchaos 05:00, 25 March 2010 (UTC)


 * (Second update) Another account, CERprophet, which seemingly pre-existed all of them has just sprung into life. Evidence of the link for that is at the AfD and also this strange edit history. Orderinchaos 12:58, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by Orderinchaos 05:00, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

to check the connection between the accounts, please. Regards, SpitfireTally-ho! 22:14, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

✅ =

Tasbian et al. have also done a little anonymous editing with other IPs than what their accounts typically edit from. I assume these are proxies, but I am not sure. J.delanoy gabs adds 04:26, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

all the confirmed accounts are now blocked and tagged. The IPs too, 212.193.239.250 for a year as a blocked proxy. SpitfireTally-ho! 08:40, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by User:DAJF
Pretty obvious sockpuppet of blocked user, focusing on same Australia-New Zealand relations and Etiquette in Japan articles. --DAJF (talk) 00:15, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Added one other. There's also been a fair bit of IP activity (see the above and, and the recently closed AfD from the previous investigation). Orderinchaos 01:00, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Blocked ~ Amory ( u •  t  •  c ) 02:19, 3 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Tasbian's block is now indefinite. Tim Song (talk) 02:54, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Amorymeltzer
I blocked User:ForKidz as a WP:DUCK for edits to Raj Patel and Maitreya that match User:PankuThu, as well as some slurring stuff on Talk:Australia – New Zealand relations. That was simple enough - it's the other edits I'm unsure of. ForKidz was also created and active on Template:SACC after both Ben16 accounts (the creator of the template) were blocked. Both User:ForKidz and User:ResignBen16 were actively trying to add a particular picture. The connections between ResignBen16 and ForKidz, between ForKidz and PankuThu, and PankuThu and Tasbian all seem strong, but I would like a checkuser to confirm the connection before thinking about pursuing a DRV or something to incorporate that info following the correctly assessed Templates for discussion/Log/2010 April 6. ~ Amory ( u •  t  •  c ) 21:00, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by ~ Amory ( u •  t  •  c ) 21:00, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

. All accused accounts are now blocked. --Deskana (talk) 13:36, 8 May 2010 (UTC)