Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tauqeerriaz/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
Both the master and sock have an (almost) single focus on our article on the 2001 Indian Parliament attack. The master and sock, additionally, have engaged in copyright violations from the same odd source: A report from Outlook India. Series of edits from the master that have done this include and, while the sock edits include this edit series where the sock tries to cover up its tracks by removing the url of the source from which the copyvio occurred (the master also previously tried to break the urls in the copyvio template).

For what it's worth, the sock only started editing after this warning was given to the master, which makes it obvious that this was an attempt to evade scrutiny. A checkuser is requested to check for sleepers. The master seems fairly persistent in POV-pushing here. —  Red-tailed hawk (nest) 10:11, 13 December 2022 (UTC)


 * appears to have blocked the master shortly after this was opened, so this may be a moot request. —  Red-tailed hawk (nest) 10:20, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I have blocked both of the accounts named above, and also, an account created after I blocked Tweeterbeez. I don't think there's any need for a checkuser, as these accounts are ducks, and each sockpuppet was created only after the previous account had been warned of a block or actually blocked, making sleepers unlikely. I have also semi-protected the article involved. I am therefore closing this investigation. JBW (talk) 11:12, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
 * For the record, the three accounts are ✅ to each other. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 11:37, 13 December 2022 (UTC)