Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Taurenlegend/Archive

Evidence submitted by Logical Fuzz
Editor Taurenlegend is a publicist for a PR firm (as he mentioned on his user page). He was warned for WP:COI on Article Incubator/Dorothy of Oz (film) in June. This was discovered when he commented that he was a rep for the production studio. I warned him of this conflict of interest in June, and his response was: ''[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ATaurenlegend&action=historysubmit&diff=369620506&oldid=369611395 'Thank You for this feedback' It was very clear and precise. I will not be contributing to the Dorothy of Oz (film) page]''. Taurenlegend has also been tagged for copyright problems on articles such as Hélène Muddiman and Trevor Wayne, and other articles he has contributed to have also had copyvios, such as Nathan Barr and James Dooley (composer), all of which are listed as |mentioned his clients.

Despite editor's claim to leave the Dorothoy of Oz article alone, he is editing a new version of the article, Dorothy of Oz (film). On November 18, I tagged Dorothy of Oz (film) and Taurenlegend's talk page again for WP:COI. He responded here that "I will discontinue to edit this article but I leave Logical Fuzz responsible for making sure that all edits and revisions are accurate and necessary". Seven minutes later, account was created. This account has since edited Nathan Barr (volunteering to write a bio (which Taurenlegend had previously contributed to, and which was tagged for copyright investigation), James Dooley (composer), and Dorothy of Oz (film). Logical Fuzz (talk) 19:13, 20 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: Twenty-four hours later, on November 21, the editor posted on the Taurenlegend account userpage that it is no longer active.

Auto-generated every six hours.
 * User compare report

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 * It's possible that these two accounts are linked, but a checkuser would clarify that. On the other hand, a CU after the master account has seemingly retired would appear to be beating a dead horse. As such I think I'm going to close this case for now. If new evidence is provided of potential sockpuppeting, though, relist and we'll take the appropriate steps. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:41, 24 November 2010 (UTC)