Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tbf69/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
's account is only 25 days old but they have prolifically and somewhat disruptively dove into backstage areas of Wikipedia such as RfD, CSD, RM, abandoned userspace drafts, etc. Their userpage states "My account is fairly new but I've had experience on Wikipedia before." It also mentions an interest in rail transport and urban planning. was indefinitely blocked on 12 March, just a few days before the creation of CityUrbanism. Their userpage and editing history show many of the same interests as CityUrbanism's, including several of the same userboxes (This user knows that Democracy Matters; This user is interested in urban planning; This user is a railfan; This user supports a free, independent, undivided, and fully restored Ukraine; This user tries to do the right thing. If they make a mistake, please let them know.) Tbf69 was blocked for what were essentially CIR issues involving maintenance areas of the project (see ANI). The warnings on CityUrbanism's talk page paint a similar pattern. They have also edited an obscure draft created by Tbf69, voted "Strongest possible support" on a RfC opened by Tbf69, and expressed disapproval of the merging of Transport in Quebec City, an article split created by Tbf69, at ANI. The two accounts' timecards are similar and distinctive. Spicy (talk) 21:37, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * based on overwhelming behavioural evidence. Closing. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 21:38, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 * These were later confirmed: . MarioGom (talk) 11:03, 15 April 2023 (UTC)