Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Technopunch/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Two "new" users that want edit war to the article same material from the same source and The probably belong to some old user so more through check is needed.--Shrike (talk) 14:16, 22 August 2017 (UTC) Shrike (talk) 14:16, 22 August 2017 (UTC) I am adding Winsocker because of this edits and .Winsocker was recently topic banned from ARBPIA area

ThisIsAgain has continued to edit in similar way he even failed ANI about this The Winsocker too have similar edits for example , Also in general editor that edit under proxy raise a lot of questions.--Shrike (talk) 08:38, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Also like ThisIsAgain and TechnoPunch, Winsocker  show negative bias against UAE [Winsocker ] There is additional piece of evidence that I will send by mail per WP:BEANS.--Shrike (talk) 19:28, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Looks like proxies are being used so CU is . Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:44, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
 * - I'm sorry, but we need more evidence if we are going to conduct a check on Winsocker. The diffs show a POV-push that I suspect is rather common. EIA shows 4 other overlaps, but all to fairly high-profile pages. GABgab 16:59, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Can you evaluate the newly-submitted evidence? ~ Rob 13 Talk 03:48, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
 * This case seems to have slipped through the cracks :/
 * The additional evidence was not quite enough to swing the balance, although the use of proxies is, indeed, suspicious. I am inclined to close, given the fact that the accounts have stopped editing at this point. GABgab 02:59, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Everyone has been inactive for months. Closing. Sro23 (talk) 14:54, 21 October 2017 (UTC)