Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Teetotaler/Archive

Report date September 16 2009, 08:48 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Evidence submitted by Beeswaxcandle

User appears to only be using the IP currently, but is signing as User:Teetotaler on some edits, but not on others. The non-controversial edits are signed (e.g. ) whereas controversial edits are not signed (e.g. - see also the edit summary for this particular edit). Beeswaxcandle (talk) 08:48, 16 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

The registered account has not edited since November 2008. I don't see any sign of recent abuse via multiple accounts here, assuming the registered account has been abandoned. MuZemike 19:02, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * Agree with MuZemike - the Teetotaler account is not currently blocked, and does not appear to be violating the socking policy. Nathan  T 19:04, 17 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Conclusions
 * Agree with MuZemike and Nathan here; there is no evidence of disruptive behavior that would be needed to justify a block. Closing and archiving. NW ( Talk ) 19:06, 17 September 2009 (UTC)