Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tehepicness/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The user keeps changing accounts to evade blocks:
 * 1) The user makes exactly the same edits—pointless typographical changes (most frequently removing spaces in infoboxes) that are not only useless, but often harmful. For example removing dashes makes the sentences lose their meaning.
 * 2) The user ignores all warnings on both user talk pages. For example repeated requests to stop changing date formats (again, a thing he keeps doing under both accounts).
 * 3) The user makes the same kind of personal attacks on his talk page, typographically and stylistically (e.g. vs. )
 * 4) Jason kurger got his level-4 warning, and then stopped editing on 7 September. AndreiTerbea created his account and started editing on 8 September. AndreiTerbea got blocked from editing on 17 September. Jason kurger then resumed editing on 18 September.

This is a WP:DUCK to me.—J. M. (talk) 23:58, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ plus:
 * is.
 * . Please move to Tehepicness.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:19, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
 * ✅ and closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  18:42, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
 * . Please move to Tehepicness.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:19, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
 * ✅ and closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  18:42, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The duck is quacking into a megaphone again. Exactly the same edits (removing white space, e.g. vs., removing dashes and hyphens, e.g.  vs. , changing date formats and other typographical vandalism, e.g.  vs. , the same typographical and intellectual style in his own messages, e.g.  vs. ), the same warnings on his talk page, the same disregard for all warnings. There may be other sock puppets, too (see the previous report). And if there is an IP address or an IP range that could be blocked, that could help, too.—J. M. (talk) 20:46, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅, blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:57, 22 November 2019 (UTC)