Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tekkneek/Archive

09 May 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

This account has a duplicate and have been creating the same article, using the same, promotional and advertisement writing styles as seen on Climbtech several times after an admin deleted it three times, after that those two users created the same article in the same manner. conduct more tests if necessary to prove this user is a sock puppet. PBASH607 (The One Day Apocalypse) (talk) 00:25, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Refer to their talk page for the proof of sock-puppetry.PBASH607 (The One Day Apocalypse) (talk) 00:42, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * I think Tech512 is a troll impersonating Tekkneek. OneTroll101 (talk) 01:30, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * They don't have overlapping edits, although they both have worked on this deleted article (admin only link).  Could be avoiding scrutiny, could be they forgot their old password, or could be two guys that are working in tandem.  Looks more likely to be improper than accidental, however. Pondering... Dennis Brown - 2¢  © Join WER 15:58, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * - - I find it very unlikely that someone would forget their password and come back 18 minutes later under a new account. Asking for a check to see if sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry is going on. King of  &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:00, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅ Tekkneek, Tech512. -- DQ   (ʞlɐʇ)  02:27, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Master blocked 1 week, sock indeffed, closing. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 02:32, 10 May 2013 (UTC)