Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tennischeck/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

All 3 users are particpating at Articles for deletion/Emir Hamzic, signing their comments in the same way and trying to make it look like there's more support for keeping the Emir Hamzic article than there actually is. The 1st 2 accounts even tried to remove the AFD notice from the article. Iffy★Chat -- 20:49, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Possible vote fraud. Endorsing for a check. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 21:02, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
 * ✅ plus --  Amanda  (aka DQ) 21:12, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
 * , Emirhamzic has no edits.  I'm not sure what the policy is here; are they still blockable even though they've never edited?  They're also the oldest account, so they become the master, but I'll hold off on doing that until I get confirmation from you on how to proceed. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:25, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
 * This is not a usual case. Usually the oldest user would have some edits...maybe some IAR is an idea here. I'm not sure. They are definitely blockable, as it's still socking. But I'll ping about the case part. --  Amanda  (aka DQ) 05:55, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
 * I'd probably just leave it with Tennischeck as the master account and block Emirhamzic as a sock given it hasn't been used. Given there isn't a justification I can see for a long block for the master, it makes more sense to let them use with an account they've used before rather than one that hasn't edited. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:57, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
 * 1 week plus Uw-sockblock for the master. Indef and tag everybody else.  Closing. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:50, 16 June 2020 (UTC)