Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheAudioArtistSubmiter/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Not sure which is the puppet and which is the master, but the sock responded to a comment on the master's talk in the first person. John from Idegon (talk) 07:47, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅. The listed sock is actually the older account, so can a clerk do the needful and move the case?  Thanks. Courcelles (talk) 14:03, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Also, I'm not sure I want to block both accounts, so I'll leave sanctions up to a clerk, as well. Courcelles (talk) 14:04, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Sock indeffed. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  19:34, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Recreation of Draft:Kelly Hyman previously created by multiple users from different sock farms. The reason linking Shinsway1977 here is this image which uploaded a few days back in commons. GSS (talk |c|em ) 00:57, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''


 * I would say it seem a case of meatsock. I had submitted another SPI for the same article/draft as evidence. May be i am not in AGF, but the last suspect was quite fishy, given he keep asking the same topic about Kelly Hyman in Teahouse. Matthew hk (talk) 14:02, 4 June 2019 (UTC)


 * While that SPI case was ended as "I don't see any evidence of socking here. There may be a COI case, but that's best for WP:COIN. ". Matthew hk (talk) 15:00, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The draft reads like PR copy. With multiple sockfarms already interested in the subject of the draft, my suspicion is that this is multiple editors responding to the same job add. As such, I've deleted the warned the it's author. If the issue persists, please report them through the usual channels for COI and paid editing. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:03, 4 June 2019 (UTC)