Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheLoanWalker/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The user Sandippradhan86, after being warned by Worldbruce and Pepperbeast for account duplicity and article vandalism, possibly created a new account WikiLoneCrusader at the same day at 14:13, 19 October 2018 from a different ip, to revive his advertising material from the article Anukulchandra Chakravarty and remove any criticism from verificable sources. Edits of this user proves the pattern of protection of the article's uncritical advertising nature • Charbak ☀      ⋠talk⋡  07:37, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I don't have multiple accounts. The only account I use is the "Sandippradhan86". If you like, you can do IP address check/session Id check/location check on your side. If you find me doing these activities, please do action. I would not have any concern(s).

The user Charbaka is trying to put vandalism content in the article without valid/proper reference. When I'm trying to correct it, he is complaining against me and putting false allegations. --Sandippradhan86 (talk) 13:27, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
 * This user has removed references cited by even primary sources, after repeated vandalism from sock puppet accounts, the article is edit locked now.• Charbak ☀      ⋠talk⋡  15:16, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
❌, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:22, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

SPAs linked to promotional hagiographic editing around Anukulchandra Chakravarty.

Both the user-names are homonymic (lone and loan) and refer to the same stuff .... &#x222F; WBG converse 13:28, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * per paucity of evidence (each account has only one edit in the retention window). . Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:39, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Also note that if a behavioural connection is determined, the case is filed under the wrong account name: TheLoanWalker is older by three years. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:40, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * , I happened to stumble across a check of these two accounts over here, where BBB23 held them as ❌. That being said, I suspect meat-puppetry. &#x222F; WBG converse 16:34, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * I did see that but I did not realize the account had been renamed. checked more than a month before me and might have had access to more edits than the two I looked at; I stand by inconclusive (cannot draw any conclusion) but that does not negate Bbb23's finding. But I agree these two accounts are probably meatpuppets at least, based on  being the same as  and.
 * please move Sockpuppet investigations/Sandippradhan86 to Sockpuppet investigations/TheLoanWalker (please leave a redirect), then merge this case into it. And then, . Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:02, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * ✅ merges. Sro23 (talk) 04:09, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
 * , a recent interesting development is the puppet replying (vide ...My friend, you speak good English. So congratulations but first deal with your third world country issues...) at my tp, to one of my message on the article-tp, directed at the master. &#x222F; WBG converse 17:52, 4 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Blocked and tagged based on behavioral evidence. The username similarity, one sock restoring a page back to a revisions by the other from six months earlier, one sock responding to messages meant for the other, users with as little as 42 total edits being knowledgeable about things like blocking, use of warning templates, etc, all adds up to DUCK.  -- RoySmith (talk) 02:21, 23 December 2019 (UTC)