Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/The Black Truth/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Similar POV, tone and WP:OR edits in which they claim that certain language speakers are descendants of migrants. In edits by the banned user The Black Truth and the by new user Tizen03, the sources doesn't explicitly mention the linguistic affinities of the migrants, making a case of original research. Suspected sock master User:The Black Truth was banned for making death threats against that very linguistic group, which the new user seem to target. Also notice similar style of edit summaries here, here, ALL CAPS et al. Editor Interaction. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:11, 16 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Adding another suspected user considering similar interest in "Mongoloid racial type". After recent addition of unsourced content here. User Tizen03 has been talking about similar racialism here, here. Updated Editor Interaction showing substantial overlap here. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 08:31, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.'' Although the SPI is closed, I came across an old diff by the suspected sock master, the wordings look very similar in style used by the new user Tizen03 here. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:37, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The edits seem to indicate at least one of the reported accounts may be a sock. I think any technical info that can help confirm this case would assist, N.J.A.  &#124; talk  15:35, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
 * - Master is stale, check connection between sockpuppets. qedk (t 桜 c) 15:57, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
 * This should be decided on behaviour. I ran a check on Tizen03 and the other account wasn't on the range. I don't feel comfortable checking the other non-stale account here.TonyBallioni (talk) 01:15, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Behaviour was a, hence requested the check. Would not recommend a block if technical data does not confirm the same. --qedk (t 桜 c) 10:29, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * No new developments, and with no technical data to confirm, closing. qedk (t 桜 c) 16:51, 24 January 2020 (UTC)