Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/The Bloodhound/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
Editor created an attack page with a specific name involved; when warned regarding this, claimed on the talk page to have multiple accounts, named The Bloodhound as one. Reviewing, I found a confirmation of socking involving the above accounts. I couldn't find an existing SPI page, therefore this request using today's contestant, for reference and to clear out the sock drawer again. Tony Fox (arf!) 05:08, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - -- RoySmith (talk) 16:45, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
 * All the listed accounts are ✅ plus.
 * The following are   -- RoySmith (talk) 17:00, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Moved case to oldest blocked account, tagged accounts, closing. Pworple has no edits - we can revisit them if they begin editing. The "possilikely" accounts do not appear to be related. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 03:57, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
 * The Bloodhound is the oldest blocked account, I believe. I'd also personally prefer that this case were kept as tagless one: they obviously take pride in the extent of their sockpuppetry (Special:Diff/1091829953, etc). Moreover, there are more socks that need tagging if we are going down the tagging route:
 * There is, additionally,, which obviously doesn't need tagging. Sdrqaz (talk) 14:49, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Apparently I missed that one of them was created an hour earlier, fixed. You're of course welcome to tag any additional account, or not tag, as you see fit. Spicy (talk) 18:51, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * per below. Ponyo bons mots 20:41, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * All ✅ to the master, blocked and tags updated. -- Ponyo bons mots 20:41, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Self stated sock here - negative editing about Jenny Barvis gain KylieTastic (talk) 20:26, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . No obvious others. Closing. --Blablubbs (talk) 20:30, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
On User talk:MyBadToiletPaper212, Special:Diff/1165411555 -Lemonaka‎  01:13, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Requesting Checkuser to find out sleepers. Since they've disclosed they have registered more than one accounts. -Lemonaka‎  01:17, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I've found two more accounts and blocked them too:
 * Closing. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:02, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Closing. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:02, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Closing. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:02, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
This vandalism-only account says they are a sock of The Bloodhound and that they have more sleeper accounts. Can we check for them and block? – Muboshgu (talk) 20:32, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * That's them, as are the one below and another already-blocked account with a similarly creative and tasteful username that I'm not going to bother listing. Fwiw, I don't think these are worth tagging. --Blablubbs (talk) 19:42, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I agree, generally speaking for this case and doubly so when the username is of this nature. Can you reverse your tag,, so that the userpage can be deleted under G5? Sdrqaz (talk) 02:45, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure I understand. You want me to blank the sock puppet's user page? – Muboshgu (talk) 03:08, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
 * G5ing it needed there to have no substantial edits by others, so by reversing your edits it could be deleted. Blanking works, sure, thanks! I will delete it shortly – let me know if there are any issues. Sdrqaz (talk) 05:15, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
 * So given the profane nature of the user name we prefer WP:DENY? I'll keep that in mind in the future. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:40, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Openly admitting to it mir  3 22:49, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Now blocked. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:36, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * pro forma. Ponyo bons mots 21:34, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Confirmed, blocked and tagged.-- Ponyo bons mots 21:34, 21 August 2023 (UTC)