Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/The Harishchanda/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Username similarities. I blocked NGO as a UPOL violation then spotted the fact that this other username exists. The SandDoctor Talk 17:18, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - worth a check for confirmation and sleepers. If confirmed, please override my block accordingly. The SandDoctor  Talk 17:18, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅. is  to ✅. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 01:30, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I overrided the block as a CU block, but I've self-reverted myself as after checking I realised the blocks were soft blocks and thus the user was allowed to create a new account. As such a block for sockpuppetry may not be appropriate here, though a normal block for advertising only account may be appropriate. Although the softblock was in place, a CU to find any pre-existing case / blocked accounts seemed to be useful (which is why I ran the check). The account found through the CU interface is noted here, but this account doesn't necessarily need a block. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 01:35, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Gah, you're right. I shouldn't have asked for an override without being more specific, my apologies. You had the same idea I had about possibly finding a pre-existing case, other blocked accounts, or more UPOL vio ones, but stated it much more eloquently than I. Thank you for taking a look at this case. -- The SandDoctor Talk 05:53, 22 November 2021 (UTC)