Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/The Suix/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Apart from the similarity of usernames, repeated creation of WooMoo and vandalism to Woo Woo. CU requested to look for other throwaway accounts that may have been created. Nthep (talk) 17:23, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Checks won't be helpful here, unfortunately. Please see WP:Sockpuppet investigations/The Suix Five. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 20:22, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Creating articles about the same subject; probably evading their indef block. 331dot (talk) 12:24, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * This actually started with, and accounts through Ten and are currently blocked. They're operating from proxies worldwide, so there isn't much that can be done other than blocking and cleaning up. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 13:17, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

User creating same pages as master; variation of name 331dot (talk) 09:04, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Already blocked and additional reports are unnecessary. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 11:31, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Ditto 331dot (talk) 09:07, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Ditto 331dot (talk) 09:12, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

~ Junior5a   (Talk)   Cont  17:46, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Account blocked. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 18:18, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

"WOOMOO" spam. Linguist Moi?  Moi.  19:35, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
I assume that this case and Sockpuppet investigations/The Suix Five need to be merged.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:17, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
 * If someone does merge, they might as well merge in Sockpuppet investigations/Statsuix as well. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:12, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ both.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  20:26, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Another one 331dot (talk) 10:20, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Seems to have used a variation of my name after I reverted some of their vandalism 331dot (talk) 10:55, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.'' Adding 331døt, who is already blocked as a vandal-only account. --bonadea contributions talk 11:06, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Linguist Moi?  Moi.  11:33, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * All accounts are already blocked, and any new accounts will be typically be blocked long before any action will take place due to SPI. Please report any other new accounts to WP:AIV. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:16, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

The first account listed is already blocked, and properly tagged and is just for here for reference. The other accounts are currently not blocked yet. Both accounts have recently vandalized 2.0 (film). Semi-protection on the article may be needed too. 2601:1C0:106:179B:4DC9:277:EC08:4F88 (talk) 19:50, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * I don't think the unblocked ones are socks of The Suix, as the contributions aren't similar to theirs. They've just made disruptive edits (one vandalised, the other edited warred) to the same article. Linguist  Moi?  Moi.  20:01, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I've left the two unblocked accounts unblocked per Linguist111; seems unlikely they are The Suix. All others, so closing.

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

This has reached stupid levels of socking. Requesting CU to put a stop to this via rangeblocks, if possible. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 12:29, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Rangeblocks aren't possible in this case because they're abusing open proxies. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:20, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I assume you've blocked the open proxies, then? Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 14:31, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
 * It was getting to be a losing proposition, so I stopped. If another CU wants to take a shot at it... ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:46, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I suppose that's fair. Since all are I'll close this case.  Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 22:57, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

2607:FB90:A6E7:2AF3:0:B:823:C801 (talk) 19:15, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Closing. Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 22:55, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Quack. Let's at least take a look at what proxies they're using and see if we can block them this time. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 22:46, 21 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Added, same "rats" summary as other accounts. Hairhorn (talk) 16:31, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Added, which still needs to be tagged. 73.96.114.195 (talk) 21:42, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Added, which still needs to be tagged. 73.96.113.71 (talk) 21:52, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Added and . All are now tagged.  Linguist  Moi?  Moi.  21:58, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I've also found . Can you tag this one as well? Thanks. 2601:1C0:106:865F:C41F:CC65:8229:D991 (talk) 22:01, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ Linguist  Moi?  Moi.  22:02, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * All ✅ – editing through proxies and VPNs. Found a couple others that have already been blocked. Closing. Katietalk 23:30, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 21:44, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Here we go again... Do you think you can get any more proxies blocked that they are using...? 2601:1C0:109:5CED:6C23:CBC3:5A59:6C5D (talk) 23:27, 25 November 2016 (UTC) 2601:1C0:109:5CED:6C23:CBC3:5A59:6C5D (talk) 23:27, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked and tagged. I was unable to identify any proxies &mdash; MusikAnimal  talk  23:58, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Not sure what their newfound obsession with Linguist111 is about, but. If a CU could please check the proxies that would be splendid. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 20:47, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

It's cause I've been tagging the socks! Time for me to stop. Linguist Moi?  Moi.  22:20, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * All blocked/tagged. I've ran checks and taken action where possible &mdash; MusikAnimal  talk  22:46, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Just for the record. All already blocked. A CU can feel free to block proxies if they want. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 23:44, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Done what I can &mdash; MusikAnimal  talk  22:18, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * Note: Added after editing this page. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 21:28, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: Added after editing this page. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 21:28, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: Added after editing this page. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 21:28, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: Added after editing this page. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 21:28, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: Added after editing this page. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 21:28, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: Added after editing this page. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 21:28, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: Added after editing this page. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 21:28, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: Added after editing this page. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 21:28, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: Added after editing this page. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 21:28, 4 December 2016 (UTC)


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Identical vandalism to Võ Nguyên Giáp. Diffs have been rev deleted, but it is clear from the page history. They are already blocked, but requesting checkuser to uncover additional accounts and see how User was able to keep creating accounts after account creation block. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 23:38, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

This is probably Sockpuppet investigations/The Suix. They edit through open proxies or something like that. Sro23 (talk) 00:13, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

This looks like an imposter who hates the original vandal; The Suix is a spammer and one of the usernames here is "We don't like spam"; "Us uck" is an obvious insult; "Open Proxy Problems" is less obvious, but "problems" should speak for itself; and "Inb4block" is 4chanese. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 23:26, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Indeed these are all the The Suix (no check necessary). Will leave it to a clerk to merge the cases. Nothing more we can do here &mdash; MusikAnimal  talk  00:47, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  19:55, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Also possible open proxies administrator would block them. ~ Junior5a   (Talk)   Cont  21:33, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Everyone's blocked. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 01:16, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Quack. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 22:50, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Quack. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 20:25, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Gosh, this guy is socking fast! 200+ socks in 7 weeks! Even Supreme Genghis Khan didn't reach this many socks until about 4–5 months after he first registered. I think it may be time for a site ban and/or an LTA page. Linguist Moi?  Moi.  20:46, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Indefinitely blocked users who no one is willing to unblock are de facto banned, though. And creating an LTA for this vandal would only be giving them the attention they want. Probably best to just RBI/report to AIV and hope they get bored of this eventually. Sro23 (talk) 22:04, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Already blocked, and Sro23's comment reflects current practice with regard to nuisances of this kind. Favonian (talk) 11:18, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

~ Junior5a   (Talk)   Cont  23:36, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Already blocked. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 16:43, 14 December 2016 (UTC)