Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/The fashionable baby/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Per the findings at Sockpuppet investigations/A portah29, Thebgcbaffie and The Texas state are socks of The fashionable baby.

Their modus operandi appears to be to add hoax info to Bad Girls Club articles, specifically fake cast members.


 * The fashionable baby (created March 19):, ,
 * The Texas state (created March 22):, ,
 * Thebgcbaffie (created April 6): ,
 * Kiyannahoe (created May 9):, , ,
 * Ilovezoey101andbgc (created May 9 by Kiyannahoe per user logs)

Check user requested to (1) confirm the most recent accounts to the past three and (2) to look for other sleepers since Kiyannahoe already created a backup amount.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 04:21, 9 May 2017 (UTC)  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 04:21, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

on the other SPI page, Bbb23 said "The fashionable baby and Thebgcbaffie are Confirmed to The Texas state and are blocked without tags." They were unrelated to A portah29, right? So I thought the appropriate thing to do when I noticed a suspected new sock of those three, unrelated-to-A portah29 accounts was to open a new SPI for them under the oldest account. Should I have kept them under the other unrelated sock master's SPI?  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 04:33, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Oh, I may have missed that. Well, Bbb23 may show up here and set stuff straight, if he ever gets out of that bordello. Drmies (talk) 04:37, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you both!  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 14:43, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
, I'm sorry, but why did you start a new SPI when these users are linked to another SPI? Am I missing something? And let's ping while we're at it... Drmies (talk) 04:27, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅, blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:08, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Introducing hoaxes to Top Model articles. Linguist talk&#124; contribs 16:07, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Added Ilovekiyannabgc17, also introducing hoaxes      . 80.189.56.105 (talk) 18:31, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅, blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:56, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Adding hoaxes to America's Next Top Model (cycle 14)  Linguist talk&#124; contribs  18:18, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Quack quack. Hoax names again.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 18:26, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked and tagged. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  18:54, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

More insertion of hoax material into America's Next Top Model's season's articles.

First sock: Second sock: Third sock:

I'm requesting a CheckUser to see if there are any more socks I've missed out/sleepers, and to see if a block on their IP or a range block is possible. Thanks. Linguist talk&#124; contribs 23:47, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅, blocked and tagged. No other accounts seen. Range blocks that might be effective are not feasible. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:16, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Hoax material on America's Next Top Model (cycle 5). Duck. Linguist talk&#124; contribs 20:12, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:40, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

More nonsense added to America's Next Top Model articles:  Linguist talk&#124; contribs  09:48, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked indefinitely by Materialscientist.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   09:24, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Duck per  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 22:38, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Oh yeah, definitely. I've indefinitely blocked the account.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   09:26, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Tagged.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   09:27, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Vandalism here, here and here. Linguist 1 1 1 10:23, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Added, see diff. Linguist 1 1 1 18:52, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:36, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Linguist 1 1 1 21:03, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:37, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Linguist 1 1 1 08:45, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
. IP blocked for 3 days. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:37, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Case closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  16:35, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Linguist 1 1 1 22:58, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:38, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Linguist 1 1 1 20:27, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
. I also blocked another obvious sock and semi-protected some articles. If I missed something, feel free to leave a message on my talk page. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:53, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Linguist 1 1 1 18:23, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Added another user Linguist 1 1 1 21:03, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:04, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Linguist 1 1 1 20:13, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
. Geez. I'm just going to add this SPI case to my watchlist. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:35, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Linguist 1 1 1 12:31, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:50, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Linguist 1 1 1 21:56, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Linguist 1 1 1 16:13, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:02, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Linguist 1 1 1 00:32, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
. At some point, maybe a checkuser should be consulted for a range block. Otherwise, we're going to end up semi-protecting a lot of pages. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:43, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Linguist 1 1 1 21:15, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Already blocked. I semi-protected the affected articles, though. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:29, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Linguist 1 1 1 17:55, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
. Also semi-protected the targeted articles. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:04, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Linguist 1 1 1 18:23, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Katietalk 01:36, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅ to each other and the master:


 * There's a lot of collateral on this range, but if it persists, I'll rangeblock it. All blocked and tagged; closing. Katietalk 01:49, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Linguist 1 1 1 18:04, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Yep, blocked. Courcelles (talk) 18:34, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Linguist 1 1 1 17:27, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Linguist 1 1 1 17:36, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
 * from multiple CheckUser-blocked sockpuppets: . Pinging for help. Linguist 1 1 1 20:42, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
 * From suspected sockpuppets on the same two pages:
 * Plus another CheckUser-blocked: Linguist 1 1 1 20:49, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:
 * 1) At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
 * 2) At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
 * 3) In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this.  Vanjagenije   (talk)  19:35, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Replied above. Linguist 1 1 1 20:42, 19 July 2017 (UTC)


 * - Please, compare those two to previous socks.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  20:44, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
 * - Katietalk 00:51, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅ plus . Blocked and tagged; closing. Katietalk 00:56, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

DUCK  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 20:07, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Oui, c'est un canard sans aucun doute. Notice the "25" at the end, as with CheckUser socks, plus this diff: (compare with CheckUser sock, adding hoax names ). Added an IP, diff: . Linguist 1 1 1 06:24, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
While I was trying to make up my mind about Selenagomez25, the account was blocked as a username violation. So, that's resolved. I blocked the IP editor for 24 hours. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:57, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Compare with CheckUser sock  Linguist 1 1 1 09:44, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:19, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Adding fake stars on America's Next Top Model (cycle 14)‎, so DUCK

Sleeper check requested given this user's persistence  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 19:06, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ plus:


 * Those are all the obvious sleepers. Blocked and tagged; closing. Katietalk 21:01, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Duck per (adding hoax names; compare with CheckUser sock ). Linguist 1 1 1 22:49, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
. Also, article semi-protected. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:17, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Duck per hoax names added (compare with CheckUser sock ). Linguist 1 1 1 21:08, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:17, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Duck per hoax names (compare with CheckUser sock ) Linguist 1 1 1 00:16, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:03, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Duck per hoax names added (compare with CheckUser sock ). Linguist 1 1 1 21:40, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:41, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Duck per hoax names added (compare with CheckUser sock ) Linguist 1 1 1 17:51, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:03, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Vandalism here (compare with CheckUser sock ). Linguist 1 1 1 08:18, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:22, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Compare with. Linguist 1 1 1 18:14, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:54, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Compare with. Exact match this time, it appears. Linguist 1 1 1 18:55, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:11, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Compare with with. Linguist un Eins uno 11:40, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:26, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

All accounts have characteristic adding of fake/hoax characters or changing of names
 * Tessbgc11 -
 * Xabossprodzx -
 * Cumforalex1-  - Also inappropriate username
 * 1jadewest -
 * Vii.xxar -
 * Snooki2001 -

This user has a history of socking and numerous accounts (see archives), so requesting sleeper check  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 22:48, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Xabossprodzx is ❌.
 * The rest of the listed accounts are ✅ plus:
 * Blocked the confirmed accounts without tags per WP:DENY. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:13, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Blocked the confirmed accounts without tags per WP:DENY. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:13, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Blocked the confirmed accounts without tags per WP:DENY. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:13, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Blocked the confirmed accounts without tags per WP:DENY. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:13, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Blocked the confirmed accounts without tags per WP:DENY. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:13, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Blocked the confirmed accounts without tags per WP:DENY. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:13, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Blocked the confirmed accounts without tags per WP:DENY. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:13, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Blocked the confirmed accounts without tags per WP:DENY. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:13, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Blocked the confirmed accounts without tags per WP:DENY. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:13, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Blocked the confirmed accounts without tags per WP:DENY. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:13, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Typically fake/hoax names on BGC articles. 

Prolific socker. Sleeper check requested  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 00:38, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Given the number of socks discovered two weeks ago, please check to identify potential sleepers. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:45, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅, along with . NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:16, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Creating fake contestants  = DUCK. CU request based on past success finding sleepers  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 18:49, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - This looks pretty clear cut to me. Please check to identify potential sleepers. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:57, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅, plus . NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:02, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Creating hoax names on reality shows again. DUCK. ,

CU for confirmation and sleeper check given user's history of socks  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 06:55, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The following are ✅ to each other:
 * They're on the same IP range as previous socks, but the technical details have since gone stale. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:19, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * They're on the same IP range as previous socks, but the technical details have since gone stale. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:19, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * They're on the same IP range as previous socks, but the technical details have since gone stale. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:19, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * They're on the same IP range as previous socks, but the technical details have since gone stale. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:19, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

SPA removing CSD's from RMV's creations, specifically related to what appears to be either UPE or an autobiog DreamDoll.

Several IPV6 edits involved with the same behavior as well. CHRISSY MAD ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  14:20, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
 * See also edits here same style contested deletion within parenthesis. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  15:07, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I've switched it over to a CU request as I find it ironic Imdawl has stopped editing once the autoblock was placed on RMV. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  16:22, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Chrissymad has beaten me to filing this SPI. She has also provided all of the relevant edit histories, but I can add that (per over a dozen warnings on their now-blanked talk page ) Realmissvoodo has repeatedly used every trick in the book to stop their articles from being deleted.--SamHolt6 (talk) 16:20, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - To confirm socking. Please compare these two. Sro23 (talk) 04:03, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ the two accounts are a straight match. - Mailer Diablo 09:44, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Master warned. Closing. Sro23 (talk) 15:24, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The username similarity aside, please see this which is an attempt to remove COI tags from the masters creation. CHRISSY MAD ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  17:21, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅, blocked and tagged. The master's block is now indefinite. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:44, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Reopening the RealMissVoodo SPI with this filing. Today I came across Dreamdoll and immediately recognized it as the article deleted per Articles for deletion/DreamDoll. The tone is the same, the text is more or less the same, and the article was created in its entirety by an ostensibly new editor. I looked at User:PinkThingz's edit history and sure enough they began editing on 11 April (first edit creating Dreamdoll with a single edit), the day after Realmissvodoo was banned for being a sockmaster. The new sock account has also recreated Realmissvodoo's article Life in Plastic as Life in Plastic (Dreamdoll EP). This is a clear case of a DUCK and another attempt by Realmissvodoo to force Dreamdoll onto Wikipedia. I would also recommend a salting of all four articles. SamHolt6 (talk) 06:50, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I've added another but the main one is already blocked. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  16:30, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.'' Comment I am pretty sure I added tags such as COI and notability tags which were removed by on both Dreamdoll and Life in Plastic. If my memory is correct I also remember that created the article in the draftspace or userspace and bypassed AfC. This will be easy for you to see the in the deleted logs if your an admin, but they are some suspicious things I noticed. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 19:24, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅, blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:24, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

obvious duck is obvious CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  11:36, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Also this. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  11:43, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk assistance requested: It looks like a duck to me. The time frame between the creation of the two pages listed by Chrissymad is too short to be considered an coincidence. The Duke of Nonsense What is necessary for thee? 14:39, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
 * um,, I think generally only an administrator/CU should be making these kind of comments. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  14:43, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I thought I did not need to be an admin/CU to help. Should I withdraw my comment? Thank you. The Duke of Nonsense What is necessary for thee? 14:45, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅ to each other but I'm not sure about the relationship to the master:

There are two different locations. Blocking w/o tags. — Berean Hunter   (talk)  17:45, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Tagged and closing. GABgab 21:58, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

been a while. quack Praxidicae (talk) 16:58, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ and blocked. I'm not giving this person any more attention with tags.  Case closed. Courcelles (talk) 12:55, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Quack quack. Changing names to fictional ones on BGC pages. . Compare to past sock:. Also abuse evident in edit filter.

CU requests for confirmation and sleeper check given history and persistence.

Adding Xxosedna based on name pattern and edit topic overlap. Similar edits too:. Also see the filter log.

 Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 22:36, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Please also see Sockpuppet_investigations/Realmissvoodoo/Archive which had a sock with a similar name. My money is on this being the sockmaster of them all  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 22:45, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Christ these reality show pages are a mess of socks and bad edits.

Compare: old sock and Juniebug1997gomaz. Though I think it was Sockpuppet investigations/A portah29/Archive that had a history of changing reasons for cast member removal. Check out the archive discussion.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 23:08, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Update: I was digging into the SPIs and blocked accounts related to BGC... it seems like there's a number of possible sock masters to consider (e.g., Sockpuppet investigations/Starbucks6789). If anyone who can access ip data or whatnot can try to sort these out based on geolocation and edits styles, it might help.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 08:22, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Awesome! Thank you !  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 15:34, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅ to the master:

to A portah29 based on geolocation and the checkuser log:

Good call,. The confirmed accounts are using specific IPs that have been used by the master in the past and some of these socks are sharing the same IP as from Sockpuppet investigations/Realmissvoodoo and intersect on multiple ranges. These cases should be merged by a clerk. As far as I can tell, no checkuser would have been able to have made that connection from the log before because the precise technical overlap is new. Blocking the confirmed accounts. Starbucks6789 case appears ❌ based on checkuser log. — Berean Hunter   (talk)  11:58, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

— Berean Hunter   (talk)  12:13, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * As an aside, is an edit warrior, not a vandal.  He likes the articles a certain way and will edit war until blocked to maintain his preferred style.  Starbucks6789 is definitely unrelated to this case, but  is a sock of Starbucks6789.  In fact, I think everyone who edits Bad Girl Club, The Challenge, Ink Master, and Ru Paul's Drag Race is a sock.  I blocked Juniebug1997gomaz as a sock of  based on the above result and my own behavioral investigation.  The other major sock on these articles is . NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:07, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Just to be clear: You want me to merge the whole Realmissvoodoo case here?  Vanjagenije  (talk)  12:08, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, and thank you.
 * ✅ and closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  14:58, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Changing names on Bad Girls Club to fake names... (e.g., ). CU given prolific history. Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 01:51, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * As far as I know, everything has gone stale. However, the following are ✅ to Mtvamanda:
 * I'll block them all without tags. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:48, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I'll block them all without tags. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:48, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I'll block them all without tags. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:48, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

DUCK per making up hoax/fake contestant names and edits about fights on BGC and ANTM. Compare to Sockpuppet_investigations/The_fashionable_baby/Archive

Prolific and persistent socker. Requesting CU.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 02:13, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ to the last batch of socks. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:59, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

WP:DUCK. Compare user name ot Mtvmarie from August 1. User is editing on Bad Girls Club pages, changing language around fights

CU requested for sleepers given prolific nature of socking  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 21:16, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * , no obvious sleepers. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:06, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Recreated Draft:DreamDoll, which was previously created by a sock of User:Realmissvoodoo, later identified as a sock of TFB.

See page logs:  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 20:34, 25 August 2019 (UTC)


 * that's quite a coincidence if so. Any other usual suspects? Maybe Realmissvoodoo wasn't actually TFB?
 * Just dug this up.

. Compare to. Also Norbson12 created DREAMDOLL which was salted by.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 05:47, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
 * It seems like everyone has gone stale, so this will probably have to be decided by behavioral evidence, but that's an interesting find. The articles are pretty different from each other, though. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:25, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
 * It's a frickin' mess. Back in January, helped sort out some of this (see Sockpuppet_investigations/The_fashionable_baby/Archive) by connecting Realmissvoodoo to TFB. A few other things I found while digging:
 * Special:Contributions/PinkThingz seems to be related to all this, and was the first sock of Realmissvoodoo to be reported. Note the edits related to DreamDoll
 * vs this old edit
 * I'll keep an eye on the account regardless.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 18:11, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Interestingly, this one is in a different country than The fashionable baby. Maybe random chance? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:23, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I looked at this before I saw the SPI and didn't feel very confident – all the behavioral signs are different too. Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) 21:40, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Closing per NRP and L235.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:44, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Behavior more matches Sockpuppet investigations/Starbucks6789 but naming pattern and targeted pages are WP:DUCK for this SPI  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 06:12, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ to several other mtv-girlname socks, unrelated to Starbucks6789. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:03, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

WP:DUCK per previous sock usernames (Mtvjenna, Mtvkailah, Mtvmarie, Mtvamanda, etc.) and user is editing on Bad Girls Club articles. Asking for CU given prolific and persistent socking.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 00:05, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅, with no additional accounts visible. ST47 (talk) 03:47, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

WP:DUCK per name and pages edited. CU requested because of history of prolific socking  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 22:12, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅. No other accounts seen. Blocked without tags per WP:DENY.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:46, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

QUACK QUACK

current account vs. blocked sock

CU requested given long long history of socking and sleepers.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 23:32, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅ to The fashionable baby. . Would a clerk please move this report to the appropriate casename? No tags per DENY. Thank you. — Berean Hunter   (talk)  19:26, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Report moved from Starbucks6789 to The fashionable baby —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 05:09, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

I am blocking this user as a suspected sock (DUCK per target pages Bad Girls Club anne creation of fake contestants ). Possibly Starbucks6789 though based on messing with cast duration sections. Requesting CU for confirmation and sleeper check. Extensive history of socking.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 06:49, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Given the past 3 cases were sleeper negative, i'm going to pass on this one. Also CUs in the archive have driven away from Starbucks6789. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 08:27, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Pro forma report. DUCK per naming pattern, overlap in articles with past socks, and changing cast names  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 03:50, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 *  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 03:51, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Previous sock: New alleged sock:

Editing pattern matches TFB's habits as well. DUCK. Asking for CU to confirm and look for sleepers  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 19:54, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * CU doesn't reveal much - all the old accounts are stale. CU logs indicate that this account is in the same large country as previous accounts, but not much more than that. There aren't any other accounts on the IP ranges they're using.   Girth Summit  (blether)  12:37, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
 * I am going to close this with no action. The more I look at the edits, the less convinced I am.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 17:45, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Pro forma report for records keeping. WP:DUCK per naming pattern.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 03:33, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 *  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 03:36, 3 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Reopening with CU request after the user posted an unblock request. Not sure if technical data are available, but I fins the naming pattern, area of editing, and content edited to be DUCK.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 04:20, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
 * ✅ to, who is also now blocked. There is undoubtedly some improper use of multiple accounts going on. Don't see any other accounts. Closing.  Girth Summit  (blether)  09:45, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Actually, I'll add to this - I just combed through the CU logs, and I'm going to call these two accounts ✅ to the proposed master. Girth Summit  (blether)  09:51, 3 June 2023 (UTC)