Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/The love pony/Archive

25 October 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

has the same edit summary as ; User:Iloveyoooou has only edited articles that User:Karah kenze also edited; both are being disruptive, with a report at ANI and one at AN3 (which I didn't originally file). User:Karah kenze claims that they got "someone to help in the future". User:Iloveyoooou just tried to deny he's "that awful guy" on my talk page, using the very same kind of broken grammar as them. According to contributions timeline, User:Iloveyoooou took over User:Karah kenze between 22:56 and 23:03, and their edits haven't overlapped since. from LjL (talk) 23:18, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * The editor is obviously also User:Amazing to you, who predates the other two, and was blocked for 48 hours on 15 October by NeilN: same suite of articles, same content of edits, same derogatory tone in the edit summaries. A checkuser should be run to see how far back we can connect them, or if there are any sleepers. BMK (talk) 00:08, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I see Bbb23 is working on it. BMK (talk) 00:10, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
 * , got it. What BMK said. --Neil N  talk to me 00:11, 26 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Wow, I wonder if I was the "someone to help in the future" that they were referring to. I attempted to help them learn how to edit tables in their sandbox with VisualEditor, since their ability to edit the source code was clearly lacking. I assumed good faith at the time, and I certainly didn't know I was helping a sockpuppeteer. —Hermionedidallthework (talk) 18:51, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
., in the future, when you change the status of a case to CU, please comment in the body of the SPI and explain why. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:47, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
 * The following accounts are ✅:
 * Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:58, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:58, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:58, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:58, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:58, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:58, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:58, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:58, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:58, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:58, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

31 October 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Pure inc "fixed" the Jay Ward Productions article to change the foundation date, remove the date it went defunct, change the years on Hoppity Hooper from 61-66 to 64-67 and blank all the General Mills stuff. At least some of this contradicts given sources.

Previous sock User:Karah kenze did the same thing last week. McGeddon (talk) 19:18, 31 October 2015 (UTC)


 * User:Awsome productions has now arrived to edit the same articles and restore some of User:Pure inc's edits (1, 2). --McGeddon (talk) 19:36, 31 October 2015 (UTC)


 * User:Curtisjeans is now asking around for "advanced editing" to get into protected articles, four minutes after Awsome productions did the same. Pure inc made the same request earlier. --McGeddon (talk) 19:44, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
, blocks all around. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:48, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * All done here. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 21:00, 31 October 2015 (UTC)


 * I've tagged the suspects as suspects because it's unclear to me if a CU was performed. Anyone? do you know? Thanks Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:30, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Suspected or proven is fine. I'm pretty certain no CU was done. Beeblebrox was clear that this was a behavioral block.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:34, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Edit by sockmaster. Edit by sockpuppet. Quack. Electric Burst (Electron firings)(Zaps) 22:39, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''


 * Please note that the alleged sock is currently blocked (for disruptive editing) and may not be able to reply here if they want to. Is there a way to give them a chance to reply without unblocking them? I have no idea whether the socking allegation is true but I do note that Ksksksksks was editing well before Kenzie20 got blocked so this doesn't fit the most common socking pattern where a blocked user creates a sockpuppet when their first account gets blocked. I guess the checkuser will reveal the truth. --DanielRigal (talk) 23:01, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * , the accused can respond on their talk page and someone can copy their responses here. clpo13(talk) 23:36, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
I've declined the CU request. The master is .--Bbb23 (talk) 23:29, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Admin requested, quack. Aggravated by the first edit summary of "I will ALWAYS change it back". Blocks requested. Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) 23:40, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * blocked for a month by  Nakon  04:05, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Sockpuppet of an indefinitely blocked user should also be indefinitely blocked. If you think they are the same person, why don't you indeff Ksksksksks?  Vanjagenije  (talk)  18:47, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I think Nakon was just noting the block, which was imposed by . In any event, I've indeffed Ksksksksks per the clerk's request. Because of my action, I'll let someone else archive this, although it should not have been closed until the confusion was resolved.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:41, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Edit by sockmaster. Edit by IP sock. Electric Burst (Electron firings)(Zaps) 03:37, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * There are some similarities with the edits provided. I've blocked the IP for 3 days. Mike V • Talk 17:10, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Edit by sock. Edit by sockmaster. . Electric  Burst (Electron firings)(Zaps) 13:35, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked 2 weeks. Neil N  talk to me 20:04, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Continued mass-removal of content from Rough Draft Studios - edit by sock; edit by sockmaster. . Electric  Burst (Electron firings)(Zaps) 03:01, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

UPDATE: Added 68.113.232.222, based on the following behavioral evidence:   Electric  Burst (Electron firings)(Zaps) 04:40, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked What-now-momas? Neil N  talk to me 04:49, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
 * 68.113.232.222 blocked one month. --<b style="color:navy">Neil N </b> <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 04:54, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Technically there's been no simultaneous use of these accounts. But I do believe this type of account-hopping is both deceptive & disruptive, given that they have been edit-warring over the same content using more than one account and claiming to be "friends" when this is clearly all just one person (compare "Clean Up."   ), especially when the undisclosed past account had been warned/blocked before they made a new one (although if I'm wrong and it turns out this really is a group of friends, it still would be a violation of WP:MEAT, I think). Sro23 (talk) 00:43, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅ + . Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:15, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Same additions of unbalanced occupation lists to infoboxes and ledes as past socks (eg. 1, 2). McGeddon (talk) 09:37, 11 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Mr. ED!ss and Morsocreepy are also making similar edits and backing up each other's reverts (eg. 1, 2). --McGeddon (talk) 08:34, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * All three ✅ to Kenzie2012 (plus ; blocked and tagged. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:45, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * This is very likely Sockpuppet investigations/The love pony, could you please merge it there. Sockpuppet investigations/Kenzie20 is also very likely the same person. Thanks, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:49, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅  Vanjagenije  (talk)  11:37, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.


 * As below.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 18:15, 11 June 2018 (UTC) Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 18:15, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Already checked. ✅ to each other and extremely (technically and behaviourally) to the master.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 18:15, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Pro forma report. TheFixer2000 was blocked by admin as a sockpuppet of this master, and subsequently, WishyWish-88 left a message on my user talk page admitting they were TheFixer2000. Mz7 (talk) 19:55, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The above accounts are ✅ to each other (the master here is ). Blocked and closing. Mz7 (talk) 19:55, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Tagging WishyWish, Courage, and Wiki2001 as CU-confirmed, since they're confirmed to TheFixer, who in turn is tagged as confirmed. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:49, 16 June 2020 (UTC)