Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ThedetectivePiash1/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
See edits by both on 2021–22 Bangladesh Championship League. Both have same interests. Unusual name: Piash — rsjaffe 🗣️ 19:03, 19 June 2022 (UTC)


 * No evidence bad sock that I can see, other than two accounts editing same page (occurred on at least four different pages). This was kind of a borderline case to begin with, and I’d be fine if you decide to drop it to focus on more serious issues. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:16, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I was about to create a SPI article untill I came across this. The user has not responded to anything on their talk page, let alone declaring the alternate account, except blanking on one occasion. They have WP:CRYSTAL issues with cricket related articles and other issues that might not be useful here. Since the investigation has not yet been archived, I just wanted to voice my opinion. Human (talk) 23:50, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * -, would you be willing to expand on whether there is any evidence of a WP:BADSOCK violation? I appreciate that it's not best practice to use two accounts to edit on the same topic without declaring the connection, but when the usernames are so similar I tend to AGF and assume there is no intent to deceive. Have they been doing anything dodgy with the accounts, like gaming 3RR or backing each other up in discussions? If not, I'd probably just ask them if they are the same person, and give them some guidance on how to declare the accounts properly - I've got a second account myself, we don't insta-block people just for failing to declare. Cheers  Girth Summit  (blether)  20:12, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I left a uw-agf-sock notice. Closing. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 10:06, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * it sounds like the main issue is their editing behaviour and not the use of multiple accounts per se. SPI isn't the best venue for dealing with other conduct issues. I'd recommend filing a report at WP:ANI. Spicy (talk) 01:04, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Similar username and contributions to similar articles. Created few days after being blocked. Looks like a duck. The other puppet got blocked at the ANI after SPI didn't work. But got to SPI at last I see. Human (talk) 15:12, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ block evasion. Blocked and tagged, closing.  Girth Summit  (blether)  10:12, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
The master named all their socks after him, Piash. This account name is 199 PIASH bd written backwards. Like the masters, his edits are limited to Bangladesh football-related articles. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 20:17, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * , DatGuyTalkContribs 20:28, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * per below. Ponyo bons mots 00:19, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Sock and sleeper ✅, blocked and tagged. Noting for the record.-- Ponyo bons mots 00:19, 22 February 2023 (UTC)