Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thenazgullord/Archive

13 September 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Indeffed master promised to create socks to keep violating WP:NCMAC and now he is following up on that promise. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις  05:23, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Sock has already been indefinitely blocked by Future Perfect at Sunrise. As an AUSC member, I would normally stay away from CU action in SPI cases; however, given the circumstances in this case, I see no problem in self-endorsing for CU attention in order to get a sleeper check.  —  Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 07:33, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
 * At the very least you should recuse if something from this gets audited Rich. That being said the named account is ✅, although I didn't find anything else and the ranges are too busy to block. NativeForeigner Talk 07:42, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, certainly, I would recuse myself in the (extremely unlikely) event of an audit case arising from this. —  Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 08:15, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Both accounts are indefinitely blocked and tagged, and the article is semi-protected following a request at Requests for page protection. There is nothing more to be done now. Ready to archive the case. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:08, 13 September 2013 (UTC)