Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Theuyhjasji/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Spamming the same domain on the same talk page in close temporal proximity (about a day's separation) with similar gibberish-like usernames. In my experience, these folks have numerous sleepers. Jasper Deng (talk) 06:04, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅. Bagging and tagging both accounts. This SPI can be closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   16:07, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

More spam of the same sort. Please check thoroughly for sleepers. Jasper Deng (talk) 07:45, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''


 * Please add User: Jonmeyarr, identical at Talk:Ketogenic diet. Sandy Georgia  (Talk)  11:16, 23 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Adding one (above) ... you said revert/block/ignore, but what about those of us who aren’t admins?  Could someone start watching Talk:Ketogenic diet? Sandy Georgia  (Talk)  09:29, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , I put Talk:Ketogenic diet on my watchlist. I also reconsidered on the range blocks - I rechecked for collateral and upon more careful investigation, it's not as bad as it looked at first glance.  Maxim (talk)  14:00, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Sandy Georgia  (Talk)  18:14, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocking both. Tagging as proven. Leaving open for CU to review the CU request. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 17:22, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * There's a healthy number of other accounts visible but they've all been blocked separately. I considered rangeblocks but IMO there's too much collateral relative to the spammer. Revert(delete)/block/ignore seems like a less-bad option here.   Maxim (talk)  01:14, 24 February 2021 (UTC)