Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Theyuusuf143/Archive

12 September 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

This user is clearly a sock of the banned user Reer Woqooyi/Theyuusuf143. If not, then a meatapuppet which have been popping up even before his ban.

Reasons:

1. User has been involved in the same content disputes as both other users                          Masters:

2.Has the same lack of understand of English           Masters:

3. Has the same editing styles           Masters:

4. User could care less about consensus                    Masters:

5. Current user has appears right after "theyuusuf13" is banned           Masters:

AcidSnow (talk) 19:00, 12 September 2014 (UTC)


 * I see. "theyuusuf143" was a mettapuppet of the other user. He went on to this blog requesting other users go help me. Anyways, can you do something about the page? It's currently locked with the socks edit still there. AcidSnow (talk) 17:58, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Reer Woqooyi and theyuusuf143 are different people. However, theyuusuf143 was called up to Wikipedia by Reer Woqopyi (he admits to asking others to help him here). AcidSnow (talk) 20:12, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
. Almost all of the comparisons are between the puppet and Theyuusuf143. However, there has never been a finding that Theyuusuf is a puppet of Reer Woqooyi. There are obvious behavioral problems here, but the technical relationships need clarification. Some of the evidence above could be said of a great many editors. For example, foreign subjects are often edited by users whose primary language is not English. Also, there are many editors, unfortunately, who don't care about consensus. That said, I think there's enough here to endorse a CU, both to clear up Kurlibah and Theyuusuf143.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:16, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Kurlibah is a ✅ match to Theyuusuf143. However, they are editing from a very long way from where Reer Woqooyi was editing, but since there is no overlap in editing, and given the several days gap between Reer Woqooyi's last edit and Theyuusuf143's first edit, I can't rule out a connection. . ​—DoRD (talk)​ 17:44, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Please provide diffs between either of the confirmed socks and Reer Woqooyi that establish a behavioral connection. It's not obvious enough to me to find that the editors are connected. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:54, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Please see Sockpuppet investigations/Reer Woqooyi.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:43, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Both accounts tagged. Bbb23 (talk) 20:52, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

27 June 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

It seems that our friend Theyuusuf143 has returned. Recently, a single purpose account has been causing a lot of disruption on the Somaliland article. Anyways:


 * Both users are from Ireland: Dandaawi and Theyusuuf143


 * Edits revolve strictly around the regions and cities claimed by Somaliland that are disputed with other Regional States of Somalia: Dandaawi and Theyusuuf143. To clarify, the new account has yet to explained to other articles.


 * Have the same editing style, see here: Theyusuuf143 and Dandaawi


 * Have the same "bizarre" way of typing in English: Dandaawi and Theyuusuf143


 * Both users don't indent their comments after someone: Dandaawi and Theyusuuf143


 * Both users often add a space before their "?": Theyuusuf and Dandaawi


 * Both users are adamantly against Awdalland, Theyusuuf143, sock of the Theyusuuf143, and Dandaawi


 * Constantly accuse others of being of being "biased" and "Pro-Somalia": Sock of Theyusuuf143 and Dandaawi


 * Flat-out denies the existence of an already established consensus while defying it: See here where they make edits against consensus, Dandaawi and TheYuusuf142. Their denial: Theyusuuf142 and Dandaawi


 * Enjoys editwaring (A report should have been filed against Dandaawi, but the account never received a warning): Dandaawi and Theyusuuf (look at his accounts history, it's not necessary to show a specific diff for something like this lol)

I could list a few more but I believe that this is enough. AcidSnow (talk) 16:34, 27 June 2015 (UTC) AcidSnow (talk) 16:34, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I see Bbb23. What do you think of the behavior and etc. that that I have shown? AcidSnow (talk) 17:13, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
 * My apologize. I didn't know that it said at the top what you plan next. AcidSnow (talk) 17:15, 27 June 2015 (UTC)


 * I relinked 1, 2, 7, 8, 9, and 10. Vanjagenije. However, links 3 and 4 are self explanatory as it shows their edit history which shows what their edits always revolve around. As for 5 and 6, they are visuals see it should be easy to see since the diffs (wiki codes) would screw it up. If you still need more than I will continue to add more.


 * As for you Dandaawi, I have already made it clear that the maps weren't misleading since Puntland claims all of Sanaag and Sool on its website: . So don't claim that I knowledge something when it never happened. But it isn't surprising that you wouldn't acknowledge claims of socking against you since this is exactly what both of Theyuusufs socks did. In fact, they instead opted to make false accusations just like you are doing once again here in front of an admin.


 * Anyways, diffs 25 through 28 have nothing to do with whether Somaliland is this or that, rather you simply edit warring the map back in. So please don't twist my words. As for seeking third opinions, Theyuusuf143 did a similar thing with different users. In fact, he even sought Admin action for a solution to the problem. There Theyuusuf143 accused me and various other users of being the same the same individuals, something that horribly failed. More importantly, in what form of way is making numerous personal attacks and then denying every making one considered "negotiations"? It's simply harassment. You even claim that I never sought third opinions when I have. In fact, I requested Howicus, CambridgeBayWeather, and Rsrikanth05 to return to continue the discussion. However, they don't see it fit as a consensus has already been established. This is something you continue to deny: "All i see is you against the world.  i see no consnsus". AcidSnow (talk) 17:56, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I think user acid is feeling the heat after he failed to bring evidences  Supprting his self designed map. He first claimed that his map is not misleading "not even the slightest"   He said. but then he realised his map is indeed Misleading when i proved that even puntland Constitution does not claim Some places he marked as disputed areas, i appreciate how he accepted to fix some parts of his map. Then i asked him if he can bring evidence supprting his claim that awdallland exists as an state against Somaliland rule in Awdal which he failed to bring. Any one who reads these talk pages can seen i am the one trying to make solution or compromise. maps user acid is twisting Wikipedia edit  rules and regulations  for his advantage  for example the  Links he posted from 25 to 28 Is a problem that existed long before i first edited Somaliland page. See here the date and time it was done some time before i joined wiki []  i never tried to change Somaliland country official name or its political status from unrecognized to recognized. I just wanted to restore the original map only. I told user howicus that i did Some technical mistake while i was trying to restore the map. map and am very sorry about that. If i enjoy edit war why i put enormous efforts to seek mediation,comments  and third opinions which he was not interested at all. I did more negotiation efforts than user Acid did. I am really very disappointed that we could not agree  much. But i hope we can agree finally. Dandaawi (talk) 15:14, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Declining CU. Everything is stale.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:07, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Links with numbers 1 to 10 are just plain links. Can you replace them with WP:diffs? It is hard for me to understand your logic this way. You cite links to whole sections, and I don't know which part of it to look at.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  15:19, 29 June 2015 (UTC)


 * This is my opinion: it is probable that Dandaawi is Theyuusuf143, but there is no evidence to prove it without any doubt.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:14, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Not enough evidence to be sure about taking SPI action, and this page has been abandoned for over two weeks, so I'm going to close without taking any action. Please note that WP:SPI is only for discussing allegations of sockpuppetry; it is not a place for rehashing content disputes or personal arguments unless they relate narrowly to the question of whether two or more accounts are in fact being operated by a single editor.  —  Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 05:38, 18 July 2015 (UTC)