Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thomas7/Archive

13 August 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

see userpage Seewolf (talk) 16:47, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

see http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Widescreen&action=history Seewolf (talk) 16:50, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry, no SUL-account, its de:user:Thomas7 and meta:user:Thomas7, en:user:Thomas7 is not involved. The last blocked one on en.wp seems to be user:Spokenees --Seewolf (talk) 16:56, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Interesting... seems to openly admit to being Thomas7 [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AWidescreen&diff=506860006&oldid=506791137], and has already been blocked as a sockpuppet of Ruckearly. (Ruckearly themself remains unblocked.) There's also, who has been indeffed for disruptive editing including edit-warring alongside Ruckearly to include a link to Thomas7's site on the German Wikipedia article. [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=German_Wikipedia&diff=prev&oldid=506793869][//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=German_Wikipedia&diff=prev&oldid=506923932][//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=German_Wikipedia&diff=prev&oldid=506966847]. Ruckearly readily admits to being Thomas7 on their user page. Jafeluv (talk) 11:12, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Also, Sockpuppet investigations/Charmingworry/Archive seems to be the same user. Jafeluv (talk) 11:33, 22 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Also noting that although Seewolf says that our Thomas7 (User:ThomasPia) is not involved, that actually looks to be the same user as well: [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:ThomasPia&oldid=485481815][//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:HighBeam/Applications&diff=prev&oldid=485483428]. Jafeluv (talk) 06:29, 28 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Prefacer7 talking about "my blog" wrt Thomas7's site: [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Complex&diff=prev&oldid=506294073]. Rechtmöglich signs as Thomas7: [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Henriette_Fiebig&oldid=506875642]. Shahin-najafi continues discussion started by another sock: [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mmg&diff=prev&oldid=500680666][//de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Spezial:Logbuch&type=block&page=User%3AAnzugPasstHeute]. It's becoming rather obvious that these are all the same person. Jafeluv (talk) 06:48, 28 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Latersoar answers to comment directed at Thomas7 on de.wikipedia: [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Complex&diff=prev&oldid=264102368][//de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Diskussion:Georges_Clemenceau&diff=prev&oldid=55332633]. Schorniradar has no edits here, but has already been blocked on dewiki as a Thomas7 sock: [//de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Spezial:Logbuch&type=block&page=User%3ASchorniradar]. It goes on and on.


 * Looking at the evidence, I'm inclined to block all listed accounts at this point. This user has been banned from de.wikipedia since 2005, and although technically not banned here, many of the accounts have long since been indef-blocked for disruption and the main purpose of the other ones seems to export disputes from de.wikipedia here. Jafeluv (talk) 10:14, 29 August 2012 (UTC)


 * All now blocked and tagged. Sockpuppet investigations/Charmingworry/Archive still needs to be merged here. Jafeluv (talk) 20:17, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I have merged the four cases into one and cleaned up the formatting. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 04:12, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 * - How does the listed master relate to this case? on enwiki redirects to, and our process here can do nothing about users on other projects. In any case, we need some evidence that these users are related and that they are in violation of WP:SOCK before we can proceed. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 04:12, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Group 1 - ✅ to each other:


 * Group 2 - to each other:


 * Group 3 - ✅ to each other:


 * Group 4 -, bordering ✅ to each other, and blocked:


 * Group 2 and 4 are on 2 different networks belonging to the same school, hence the non-confirmed result.
 * Group 1 and 3 are to each other and to the school networks above. --  DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  04:09, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

21 September 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

signed by this name Seewolf (talk) 22:39, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  13:02, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Ugh...ok, ✅ + . More s issued, probally more socks, but I didn't check everything from last time. I tried to forward -- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  11:32, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Already blocked and tagged so closing.