Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thomastruong158/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
Both users started editing on the same date and appear coordinated with Draft:Thomas TRUONG. Thomastruong158's username shows a possible COI. Both users have some ChatGPT work as well. Regardless I think WP:COMPETENCE applies here.

TLA (talk) 10:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Dear TLA,
 * I hope this message finds you well. I am reaching out regarding the CheckUser request and the concerns raised about potential sockpuppetry involving my account and UserJan2024, in relation to the draft article on Thomas TRUONG. I appreciate the vigilance of the Wikipedia community in upholding the integrity of its content and understand the significance of these concerns. However, I wish to provide context and clarification that may address the points raised.
 * Firstly, the simultaneous start of our editing activities and our coordination on the Draft:Thomas TRUONG arises from a shared academic and professional interest in Thomas TRUONG's work, rather than any intent to circumvent Wikipedia's policies. My username's apparent COI (Conflict Of Interest) is a reflection of my academic focus and dedication to documenting significant technological advancements, including those by Thomas TRUONG, in a transparent and objective manner.
 * Regarding the use of ChatGPT and other AI tools, I want to clarify that all information utilized was public and the drafting process aimed at maintaining objectivity, in line with Wikipedia's standards for neutrality and verifiability. The inclusion of ChatGPT work was intended to enhance the article's quality through accurate data processing and language refinement, not to manipulate or bias content.
 * Given the concerns about coordination between accounts, I respectfully request that the focus be placed on the contributions of UserJan2024, as their edits and additions to the draft have been substantial and in strict adherence to Wikipedia's guidelines. Their involvement has brought valuable insights and additional reputable sources to the draft, further establishing the notability of Thomas TRUONG.
 * The references from the MIT Technology Review and newly identified sources such as BFM Business and industry interviews provide robust, independent coverage of TRUONG's contributions to artificial intelligence and accessibility technologies. These sources underscore the significant societal impact of his work, his receipt of prestigious awards, and his influence in the tech community, directly addressing the notability concerns previously highlighted.
 * I am fully committed to upholding Wikipedia's standards and am prepared to make further revisions to the draft to ensure it meets the highest criteria for accuracy, neutrality, and verifiability. Your specific guidance and feedback would be immensely valuable in this process, helping to refine the submission to meet and exceed the required standards.
 * In closing, I kindly ask for a reconsideration of the draft in light of the additional sources and information provided, focusing on the contributions by UserJan2024. I believe that with the proposed adjustments, the article will fulfill Wikipedia's notability and sourcing requirements, offering encyclopedic value to readers worldwide.
 * Thank you for your time, consideration, and the invaluable work you do for the Wikipedia community. I look forward to your feedback and am ready to collaborate further to contribute a valuable and informative article to Wikipedia.
 * Warm regards, UserJan2024 (talk) 11:07, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
 * come on dude, don't post this AI garbage here. Spicy (talk) 11:09, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I noticed your recent comment and appreciate your straightforwardness. However, my initial message aimed to address specific concerns raised about potential sockpuppetry and content validity. I'd truly value your insights on these matters.
 * Could you please share your thoughts on how we might constructively move forward given the situation? Your guidance on addressing the concerns raised would be greatly appreciated, as my goal is to contribute positively to Wikipedia within its guidelines. Thomastruong158 (talk) 11:13, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
 * When you say "my initial message aimed to address", you are presumably referring to that AI-generated wall of text to which @Spicy replied? That being the case, this would seem to confirm that @Thomastruong158 and @UserJan2024 are indeed operated by the same individual(s). -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:33, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


 * I'm adding a new SPA, Techlover1593, to this investigation, as they have just created Draft:Thomas Truong. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:10, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your message. I acknowledge the concern and would like to clarify that the creation of multiple accounts was an unintended mistake, particularly regarding the username confusion with article titles. I request the deletion of any other accounts associated with me, except for "Techlover1593" which I will continue using for my contributions. I appreciate your understanding and guidance on this matter. Techlover1593 (talk) 17:13, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Accounts can't be deleted. 32.220.205.180 (talk) 19:01, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The three accounts are unsurprisingly ✅. Indeffed for socking, as well as WP:NOTHERE, WP:CIR, inability or unwillingness to communicate with others without using an AI chatbot, etc. Spicy (talk) 21:27, 11 February 2024 (UTC)