Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thoriq Azka Rahmat/Archive

02 August 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

1. Reincarnation of once-blocked User:Thoriq Azka Rahmat, by their own admission in the first sentence at their userpage.

2. CU comparison against unused, but recent account User:Thoriq rahmat would be a good idea, too (similar, unusual name).

3. Continues to edit-war on the same and similar pages regarding airports.

4. Claims to want to help, but doesn't seem to quite understand the roles of editors, admins, and WP policies regarding WP:RS, WP:CIVIL. Not sure if they have sufficient English skills to contribute, either.

5. (edit) Disruptive editing continues, last at 2013-08-05T14:51 UTC. Several pics uploaded, linked, speedily deleted for copyvio. Continued edit-warring on airport articles. Refusal to engage in discussion, other than this apparent threat.

They at least need to stop edit warring immediately, and could use a mentor from whom they will accept guidance. Or just be blocked for cause. —&#91;  Alan M 1  (talk) &#93;— 18:00, 2 August 2013 (UTC) (edited) —&#91;   Alan M 1  (talk) &#93;— 21:29, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Sock accounts blocked indefinitely and master blocked for two weeks. The fact that Thoriq was told he was blocked for a week, evaded the block, and proudly announced his identity on his userpage, makes me suspect severe competency or language comprehension issues. Someguy1221 (talk) 01:54, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

07 August 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Created day after block of previous socks. Immediate repeat of same type of edits (upload of copyvio pics) to same article (Soekarno–Hatta International Airport). Can we block the IP (if it's the same one in Kuwait) from creating accounts? —&#91;  Alan M 1  (talk) &#93;— 18:24, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - I've blocked them all indefinitely now. Given some requests via ACC, I can confirm the IP range is far too wide to block. Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:24, 8 August 2013 (UTC)