Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tibetfox001/Archive

21 March 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

All three editors edit war over the same whitewash edits at Scientific Research Publishing and a wording change at Jeffrey Beall. See the article histories here and here. I think WP:DUCK is sufficient. Randykitty (talk) 10:21, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Snubspeck just confirmed the use of multiple accounts. --Randykitty (talk) 10:44, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The issue has become moot, since both named editors have been blocked for attempted outing and harassment. --Randykitty (talk) 12:04, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I have two ids for wikipedia because Randykitty kept reverting my revisions.I made proper source, and did not whitewash as Randykitty reports. I thought my id was the problem. You see I am new here.I apologize.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . 12:22, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Given this edit from the IP (1) and this one from one of the accounts (2), I've blocked the IP for a week. All accounts are tagged. Mike V • Talk 15:52, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
 * . 12:22, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Given this edit from the IP (1) and this one from one of the accounts (2), I've blocked the IP for a week. All accounts are tagged. Mike V • Talk 15:52, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
 * . 12:22, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Given this edit from the IP (1) and this one from one of the accounts (2), I've blocked the IP for a week. All accounts are tagged. Mike V • Talk 15:52, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
 * . 12:22, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Given this edit from the IP (1) and this one from one of the accounts (2), I've blocked the IP for a week. All accounts are tagged. Mike V • Talk 15:52, 21 March 2015 (UTC)