Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Timlaieditor/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

UPE sock activity around R.E. Lee Capital, Suparatana Bencharongkul and others. See below. — Berean Hunter   (talk)  19:01, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments




Blocking the confirmed with tags and will post to COIN. — Berean Hunter   (talk)  19:02, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
 * does not seem to be related, though their edit to their userpage is concerning. Everybody else is already blocked. Closing. Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:36, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

See below. — Berean Hunter   (talk)  14:45, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅ to

— Berean Hunter   (talk)  14:45, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. Ready to archive.  QEDK ( 後  ☕  桜 ) 15:02, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Obvious identical editing patterns to those of blocked sock คนรักอาหาร365. Paul_012 (talk) 06:41, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Given the editor's history of sleeper use, please check if any exist. Sir Sputnik (talk) 12:44, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
 * ✅, but . —DoRD (talk)​ 13:08, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Closing. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:31, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Obvious behaviour re-creating draft copies of deleted article Suparatana Bencharongkul (this time at Draft:S Bencharongkul). Paul_012 (talk) 18:34, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Given the history of additional accounts found in the archive, I ran a check. ✅, no sleepers. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:12, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The account was created two days after their previous sock uploaded File:Suparatana Bencharongkul (Public).jpg and their first edit was to use the same image at Suparatana Bencharongkul. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 14:10, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * There's also a bunch of suspicious accounts in Articles for deletion/Calvin Lo, related to an article previously associated with this spammer: R.E. Lee Capital. MER-C 18:22, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Group 1, confirmed to each other:

Group 2 appears technically unrelated to group 1. It's a bit of a rabbit hole, but using a number of heuristics I would say these are confirmed to each other:

Note the other SPIs at Sockpuppet investigations/MNB9911 and Sockpuppet investigations/Hamza3132.

In terms of geolocation, Group 1 and Timlaieditor probably don't belong together, but I probably wouldn't pay too much attention to that. -- zzuuzz (talk) 22:29, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 * closing. The SandDoctor  Talk 04:17, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Group 1:

Group 2:


 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

There are two groups here. Group 1 has similar behavior (sneaking spam in as "refs" in articles) to known Timlaieditor socks Worrieredits, MNALHR, and Havechin, and they're trying to sneak in a bunch of the same domains. Group 2 has tried to spam two of those domains as well, but in a different way (as their "website" in an infobox on their userpage, looks more like a spambot). I've blocked all of these accounts as promo-only, Group 1 is a slam dunk behaviorally, but requesting CU for a sleeper check since we've had a fair amount of success using that against this particular sock ring. I'm also curious whether Group 2 is the same sock ring or a different one. GeneralNotability (talk) 17:46, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
---
 * - Self-endorsing. Yes, I know Vishgo is stale. GeneralNotability (talk) 17:47, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Cutlery4all is definitely this sockfarm - I've seen the ad on People Per Hour. MER-C 12:18, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
 * They're all related; I'd call all but PPP786 ✅, and PPP786 is . Also is ✅.   Maxim (talk)  16:42, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
 * A couple more probables thanks to 's spot of Blackmold:
 * (commons-only, no enwiki account)
 * (also commons-only)
 * Will block the local ones and file for global locks on everyone GeneralNotability (talk) 17:01, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
 * across the board, global lock request will be filed shortly. GeneralNotability (talk) 17:04, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
 * across the board, global lock request will be filed shortly. GeneralNotability (talk) 17:04, 9 July 2020 (UTC)