Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tinkvu/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Tinkvu and Nezvm both are involved in some articles same time. Seems sockpuppetry.

Read more at Administrators' noticeboard and Nomination of Articles for deletion. Sabeelul hidaya (talk) 18:09, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Nezvm is only involved in articles that involved by Tinkvu.
 * Nezvm's major contributions are to the Musa Sherif. He is published it from Draft. Tinkvu also involved in the article to protect it and Tinkvu is uploaded an image to the Commons on 08:22, 9 October 2021 after three minutes Nezvm added it to the article on 08:25, 9 October 2021(later deleted).
 * Nezvm once involved in the Yuva Kumar to support Tinkvu and remove the Notability tag from the article. Both articles are listed in Tinkvu's user page.
 * Tinkvu tried many times to support/keep Darul Huda Islamic University and he is participated the discussion in article's talk, anb and other discussion pages. Now he is used the account, Nezvm instead using main account to vote Keep at deletion discussion of Darul Huda Islamic University. Sabeelul hidaya (talk) 02:52, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Tinkvu is removed the list of paid contributions from his user page after i was mentioned that here. Sabeelul hidaya (talk) 03:04, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Additional information added. Sabeelul hidaya (talk) 03:06, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . Nezvm's name does not appear once in your evidence at AN, unless I'm missing something. Please provide evidence, in the form of diffs, showing that this is sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry. Please remember that accusations without evidence constitute personal attacks.  --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 19:42, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
 * So, they admit to being paid by the same person, and it's implicit in that that they'll be collaborating on articles, which is allowed. You may not like it, but that's where Wikipedia policy currently stands. However, they should not then be tag-teaming in discussions. This is your only warning: Do not !vote in the same AfDs or other content discussions, in areas where one or both of you has a COI. I am going to strike Nezvm's !vote at the ongoing AfD on this basis. Please understand that policy states: when there is uncertainty whether a party is one user with sockpuppets or several users with similar editing habits they may be treated as one user with sockpuppets. Furthermore, Nezvm, I trust that if you are removing the paid editing disclosure from your userpage, that means that you never intend to edit regarding to Musa Sherif again. If that is not the case, please restore the disclosure.With all that in mind, closing.  --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 03:16, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Just to elaborate slightly: I'm aware that Nezvm has not disclosed a COI with DHIU. My reason for this warning is that, once two people are established to be paid editors working together, there is at best a strong appearance of impropriety if one turns up to defend the other's article at AfD, and at worst a violation of WP:SOCK. If anyone thinks that Nezvm has a COI with DHIU that they have failed to disclose, they should raise the matter at WP:COIN. --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 03:30, 7 January 2022 (UTC)