Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Titodutta/Archive

19 July 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

This comment here, where he says "I made changes." But actually the person who made the changes was CorrectKnowledge. Please see this diff. So that doesn't make much sense, unless they are both the same person. BrahmanAdvaita (talk) 17:11, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * See the link there in my post. Will make sense, I think! -- Tito Dutta  ✉  17:52, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.'' Can someone do the SPI investigation quickly please? I have lots of other works! Thanks!-- Tito Dutta  ✉  17:47, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Tito, there is nothing to prevent you from carrying on as before. Clerk, this comment by CorrectKnowledge on my talk page appears to be instructive. Even before it was posted, I believed this to be a good faith but incorrect report. The assumption is a Freudian slip but the history of these two users suggests otherwise. - Sitush (talk) 19:30, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Okay, then, Sitush, please comment from neutral point of view. I am copy pasting the same post which has been mentioned above, please read it–
 * Incorrect! See here, I proposed the change, you did not post any comment, but when I made changes, you came into scene immediately. This time too you have come into scene when the edit is done
 * – 1) Now there is a link added in my post (the word "here"), please click on the link to see which proposal I was talking about. You will find it is a similar but old discussion!
 * 2) Also read it full, the last sentence begins with– This time too you have come into scene when the edit is done – does not it clearly indicate a) I am talking about the previous incident? b) I have not made the edit? Now, please tell me, where was the Freudian slip? -- Tito Dutta  ✉  10:27, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- The evidence against Titodutta and CorrectKnowledge is too ambiguous to warrant an invasion of privacy such as a checkuser. It is also too vague to pass the WP:DUCK test and link these two editors together.--v/r - TP 16:00, 20 July 2012 (UTC)