Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tkjaros/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Clearly two SPAs bent on puffing up Licona's article. Both readding identical content and Tkjaros came back from the dead. Pinging who has been cleaning it up. Praxidicae (talk) 19:50, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Sweet Jesus, that one again? How inappropriate, people promoting scholars in those kinds of ways. Positively unbecoming, but I see that the indefatigable has already separated the wheat from the chaff. Drmies (talk) 17:55, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

I suspect more meat puppetry than direct socking in this case but yet another long inactive account suddenly returns from the dead to puff up Michael R. Licona Praxidicae (talk) 18:28, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Clearly a sock. I'm not sure if anyone noticed, but they copied the last obvious-paid-agency sock's last promotional version of the article to their sandbox, made minor cosmetic changes, and resubmitted it as a "rewrite". Unsure whether this is sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry, but doesn't really matter. Blocked. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 19:43, 7 March 2019 (UTC)