Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tngah/Archive

Report date July 3 2009, 06:34 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

This user abused sockpuppets to violate WP:DE, WP:V, WP:RS, WP:EW, WP:TE
 * Evidence submitted by Che829

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=White_American&diff=300680786&oldid=300679421 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=White_American&diff=300349345&oldid=300347139 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=White_American&diff=300325243&oldid=300258568 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=White_American&diff=299902890&oldid=299902081 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=White_American&diff=299780197&oldid=299778055 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=White_American&diff=299064000&oldid=299063498 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=White_American&diff=298974884&oldid=298968943

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=White_American&action=history 22:00, 6 July 2009 216.194.21.145 (talk) (31,829 bytes) http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=White_American&diff=300679421&oldid=300437705 03:59, 5 July 2009 68.173.95.177 (talk) (31,829 bytes) http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=White_American&diff=300347139&oldid=300325243 17:09, 4 July 2009 Tngah (talk | contribs) (31,829 bytes) 15:27, 2 July 2009 Tngah (talk | contribs) (31,829 bytes) http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=White_American&oldid=299902081 22:54, 1 July 2009 69.86.6.163 (talk) (31,829 bytes) 22:25, 1 July 2009 69.86.6.163 (talk) (31,829 bytes) http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=White_American&oldid=299778055 21:57, 1 July 2009 68.173.95.177 (talk) (31,829 bytes) 03:48, 1 July 2009 68.173.95.177 (talk) (31,829 bytes) 21:41, 30 June 2009 68.173.95.177 (talk) (31,829 bytes) 21:37, 29 June 2009 68.173.95.177 (talk) (31,829 bytes) 17:15, 29 June 2009 68.173.95.177 (talk) (31,829 bytes) 17:10, 29 June 2009 68.173.95.177 (talk) (31,829 bytes) 16:45, 29 June 2009 68.173.95.177 (talk) (31,829 bytes) 03:01, 29 June 2009 68.173.95.177 (talk) (31,829 bytes) http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=White_American&oldid=299236820 03:41, 27 June 2009 68.173.95.177 (talk) (31,371 bytes) http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=White_American&oldid=298874628 22:21, 24 June 2009 Tngah (talk | contribs) (31,371 bytes) http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=White_American&oldid=298448588

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Racism_in_Argentina&action=history 01:32, 2 July 2009 68.173.95.177 (talk) (34,756 bytes) 22:55, 1 July 2009 69.86.6.163 (talk) (34,306 bytes) http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Racism_in_Argentina&oldid=299782733 22:36, 1 July 2009 68.173.95.177 (talk) (34,306 bytes) 21:58, 1 July 2009 68.173.95.177 (talk) (34,756 bytes) 04:05, 1 July 2009 68.173.95.177 (talk) (34,756 bytes) 21:41, 29 June 2009 68.173.95.177 (talk) (34,306 bytes) 18:49, 29 June 2009 68.173.95.177 (talk) (34,306 bytes) http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Racism_in_Argentina&oldid=299360317 This discussion page http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Racism_in_Argentina&action=history edited by Tngah, 68.173.95.177 pretend to be someone else on behalf of him/herself. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Racism_in_Argentina&diff=299631325&oldid=204412203 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ARacism_in_Argentina&diff=299750617&oldid=299631513 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Racism_in_Argentina&diff=299806272&oldid=299750617 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Racism_in_Argentina&diff=299806957&oldid=299806272 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Racism_in_Argentina&diff=299807168&oldid=299807011 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Racism_in_Argentina&diff=299824492&oldid=299807168 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Racism_in_Argentina&diff=299901126&oldid=299824492 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Racism_in_Argentina&diff=299901763&oldid=299901357 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Racism_in_Argentina&diff=299921284&oldid=299901763 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Tngah Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to White American. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:68.173.95.177 Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page White American has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 17:11, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edit to the page Racism in Argentina appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any other tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Stop creating mistakes with the direct translation of Juan Bautista Alberdi as seen at this page. Binksternet (talk) 22:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Racism in Argentina. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Binksternet (talk) 03:44, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on White American. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:69.86.6.163 Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to White American, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. JForget 22:55, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:216.194.21.145 Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to White American, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. --LjL (talk) 22:11, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Chronology 22:03, 6 July 2009 (hist) (diff) Talk:White American (216.194.21.145) 22:01, 6 July 2009 (hist) (diff) Talk:White American (216.194.21.145) 22:00, 6 July 2009 (hist) (diff) White American (216.194.21.145) 22:00, 6 July 2009 (hist) (diff) Talk:White American (216.194.21.145) 04:34, 5 July 2009 (hist) (diff) Talk:White American (68.173.95.177) 04:34, 5 July 2009 (hist) (diff) Talk:White American (68.173.95.177) 04:20, 5 July 2009 (hist) (diff) Talk:White American (68.173.95.177) 03:59, 5 July 2009 (hist) (diff) White American (68.173.95.177) 17:15, 4 July 2009 (hist) (diff) Talk:Racism in Argentina (68.173.95.177) 17:09, 4 July 2009 (hist) (diff) White American (Tngah) 17:06, 4 July 2009 (hist) (diff) Talk:White American (68.173.95.177) 16:09, 2 July 2009 (hist) (diff) Talk:White American (Tngah) 16:08, 2 July 2009 (hist) (diff) Talk:White American (Tngah) 16:06, 2 July 2009 (hist) (diff) Talk:White American (Tngah) 16:04, 2 July 2009 (hist) (diff) Talk:White American (Tngah) 16:01, 2 July 2009 (hist) (diff) Talk:White American (Tngah) 15:56, 2 July 2009 (hist) (diff) Talk:White American (Tngah) 15:27, 2 July 2009 (hist) (diff) White American (Tngah) 15:24, 2 July 2009 (hist) (diff) Talk:Racism in Argentina (68.173.95.177) 15:21, 2 July 2009 (hist) (diff) Talk:Racism in Argentina (68.173.95.177) 01:47, 2 July 2009 (hist) (diff) Talk:Racism in Argentina (Tngah) 01:46, 2 July 2009 (hist) (diff) Talk:Racism in Argentina (Tngah) 01:45, 2 July 2009 (hist) (diff) Talk:Racism in Argentina (Tngah) 01:41, 2 July 2009 (hist) (diff) Talk:Racism in Argentina (Tngah) 01:32, 2 July 2009 (hist) (diff) Racism in Argentina (68.173.95.177) 23:21, 1 July 2009 (hist) (diff) User talk:69.86.6.163 (69.86.6.163) 23:19, 1 July 2009 (hist) (diff) White American (69.86.6.163) 23:13, 1 July 2009 (hist) (diff) Talk:White American (69.86.6.163) 23:11, 1 July 2009 (hist) (diff) Talk:White American (69.86.6.163) http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:White_American&diff=299785048&oldid=299247970 23:10, 1 July 2009 (hist) (diff) User talk:69.86.6.163 (69.201.156.82) http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:69.86.6.163&diff=299784936&oldid=299784705 23:08, 1 July 2009 (hist) (diff) User talk:69.86.6.163 (69.86.6.163) 23:06, 1 July 2009 (hist) (diff) User talk:69.86.6.163 (69.86.6.163) 22:55, 1 July 2009 (hist) (diff) Racism in Argentina (69.86.6.163) 22:54, 1 July 2009 (hist) (diff) White American (69.86.6.163) 22:36, 1 July 2009 (hist) (diff) Racism in Argentina (68.173.95.177) 22:25, 1 July 2009 (hist) (diff) White American (69.86.6.163) 21:58, 1 July 2009 (hist) (diff) Racism in Argentina (68.173.95.177) 21:57, 1 July 2009 (hist) (diff) White American (68.173.95.177) 04:09, 1 July 2009 (hist) (diff) Talk:Racism in Argentina (68.173.95.177) 04:09, 1 July 2009 (hist) (diff) Talk:Racism in Argentina (68.173.95.177) 04:09, 1 July 2009 (hist) (diff) Talk:Racism in Argentina (68.173.95.177) 04:05, 1 July 2009 (hist) (diff) Racism in Argentina (68.173.95.177) 04:02, 1 July 2009 (hist) (diff) Racism in Argentina (68.173.95.177) 03:48, 1 July 2009 (hist) (diff) White American (68.173.95.177) 21:41, 30 June 2009 (hist) (diff) White American (68.173.95.177) 21:41, 29 June 2009 (hist) (diff) Racism in Argentina (68.173.95.177) 21:39, 29 June 2009 (hist) (diff) Racism in Argentina (68.173.95.177) 21:37, 29 June 2009 (hist) (diff) White American (68.173.95.177) 18:54, 29 June 2009 (hist) (diff) Anti-Italianism (68.173.95.177) 18:53, 29 June 2009 (hist) (diff) Anti-Italianism (68.173.95.177) 18:53, 29 June 2009 (hist) (diff) Anti-Italianism (68.173.95.177) 18:52, 29 June 2009 (hist) (diff) Anti-Italianism (68.173.95.177) 18:49, 29 June 2009 (hist) (diff) Racism in Argentina (68.173.95.177) 17:15, 29 June 2009 (hist) (diff) White American (68.173.95.177) 17:10, 29 June 2009 (hist) (diff) White American (68.173.95.177) 16:45, 29 June 2009 (hist) (diff) White American (68.173.95.177) 03:01, 29 June 2009 (hist) (diff) White American (68.173.95.177) 02:44, 29 June 2009 (hist) (diff) White American (68.173.95.177) 02:33, 29 June 2009 (hist) (diff) White American (68.173.95.177) 21:42, 28 June 2009 (hist) (diff) White American (68.173.95.177) 20:44, 28 June 2009 (hist) (diff) White American (68.173.95.177) 20:39, 28 June 2009 (hist) (diff) White American (68.173.95.177) 19:39, 28 June 2009 (hist) (diff) White American (68.173.95.177) 15:14, 28 June 2009 (hist) (diff) White American (68.173.95.177) 04:55, 28 June 2009 (hist) (diff) White American (68.173.95.177) 17:20, 27 June 2009 (hist) (diff) White American (68.173.95.177) 03:41, 27 June 2009 (hist) (diff) White American (68.173.95.177) 22:21, 24 June 2009 (hist) (diff) White American (Tngah) 22:17, 24 June 2009 (hist) (diff) White American (Tngah) 22:14, 24 June 2009 (hist) (diff) White American (Tngah) 17:18, 24 June 2009 (hist) (diff) White American (68.173.95.177) 18:20, 23 June 2009 (hist) (diff) White American (Tngah) 18:18, 23 June 2009 (hist) (diff) White American (Tngah) 17:57, 23 June 2009 (hist) (diff) White American (68.173.95.177)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Probably the same, but what abuse has occurred? Looks like an editor that has forgot to log in occasionally, but if you have evidence of problematic behaviour, please state it. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 00:35, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
 * Striking per the introduction of new evidence. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 13:53, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Having reviewed the evidence and the contributions, I believe that Tngah is using the IPs to edit war. Given the edits themselves, I have blocked the user. IPs given short blocks because they are dynamic. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 21:31, 7 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Conclusions

Report date July 24 2009, 17:36 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

user admits his sockpuppetering here Wuh  Wuz  Dat  17:36, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by Wuh  Wuz  Dat

These accounts consistently revert to the same version (an example of said version; examples:      ). Additionally, Conley1 and both IPs have a penchant for refering to LjL as "NOT A REAL MAN" and other such gems ( and ), as well as assuming that users who disagree with them are racists. lifebaka++ 20:01, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by lifebaka++
 * Oh, right. I've also indef blocked Conley1 for attacks, as he passes the duck test for the IPs, who have been warned for such before.  Cheers, everyone.  lifebaka++ 20:03, 24 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * Conclusions

Per Lifebaka. Nothing more to do here. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 23:32, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Report date August 25 2009, 20:31 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Evidence submitted by Che829

This user is known for edit warring, disruptive editing, evasion of block, and personal attacks. Please also see Sockpuppet investigations/Tngah/Archive.


 * arbitrary change of year 1985 to 1984
 * User:68.173.91.50:
 * User:Davidx5:
 * User:68.173.95.177:
 * User:Taurusx5:
 * User:66.108.211.207
 * User:Ingrid4hubby:


 * constantly revert to the same revision "Castle" (37,932 bytes) and create page titled "Castles in Europe" (37,932 bytes) with same revision as well
 * User:68.173.89.10:
 * User:Ingrid4hubby:


 * constantly revert to the same revision "White American" (31,829 bytes)
 * User:216.194.7.106:


 * mistake of existence of the author of article
 * User:68.173.91.50:
 * User:Conley1:
 * User:68.173.95.177:


 * identity
 * User:Davidx5's reply to  identify User:68.173.91.50
 * User:68.173.95.37's reaction to  identify User:68.173.91.50
 * User:70.107.99.218's reply and User:68.173.95.37's reply
 * User:66.108.40.200's reaction to  identify User:69.86.162.170
 * User:Ingrid4hubby's modification of  identify User:69.86.162.170
 * User:Ingrid4hubby pretend to be someone else on behalf of himself User:68.173.91.50


 * Evidence submitted by CJ DUB

Investigation relates primarily to the discussion page for the Castle article Talk: Castle. repeatedly attacked the other editors and was blocked indefinately after several warnings, shortly after the termination of an earlier 24 hour block. The user was blocked the previous week under the IP, due to abusive remarks and language, and was previously using the other IP listed at top.

There was an earlier investigation for SPI that has concluded that related to another page, this time under

The pattern of anti-american comments directed at all editors disagreeing with the user, is consistent within all the user's sockpuppets provided above.

Cheers, CJ DUB (talk) 22:39, 31 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users
 * seems to be a pretty obvious sock of . Tngaf registered an account on 17:32 31 August 2009 and the account's first edit was nine minutes later accusing others of intimidation and bias. It looks pretty straightforward, but I am concerneed that this user has been using multiple accounts abusively for a long time. I am not the only one to believe this, thinks that Ingrid4hubby is a sock of Tngah who, according to the evidence from the SPI for that account, went around accusing people of racism. Che829 also included  in that list; Davidx5 edited disruptively at talk:castle and accused  of racism. This account is unfortunately stale (hasn't edited since 2 May 2009), but the pattern of accusations of racism and disruption on talk:castle is similar and makes me wonder if there are any further socks out there. Nev1 (talk) 12:03 am, Today (UTC+1)

Requested by CJ DUB (talk) 22:39, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests

– behavioral evidence and editing patterns (look at Talk:Castle) clearly indicate that these accounts are the same user. CU is not necessary. MuZemike 03:10, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * – on second thought, I'm going to endorse this, because I did not see this case as it was not placed on the queue. Yeah, there's a sockfarm going on here, and this needs to be weeded out. MuZemike 03:16, 1 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * ✅ the following appear to be the same individual:
 * Very that Davidx5 is related to the above group, judging from behavior. I've blocked their most used IP, and may be able to block more if necessary. –  Luna Santin  (talk) 08:01, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Very that Davidx5 is related to the above group, judging from behavior. I've blocked their most used IP, and may be able to block more if necessary. –  Luna Santin  (talk) 08:01, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Very that Davidx5 is related to the above group, judging from behavior. I've blocked their most used IP, and may be able to block more if necessary. –  Luna Santin  (talk) 08:01, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Very that Davidx5 is related to the above group, judging from behavior. I've blocked their most used IP, and may be able to block more if necessary. –  Luna Santin  (talk) 08:01, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Very that Davidx5 is related to the above group, judging from behavior. I've blocked their most used IP, and may be able to block more if necessary. –  Luna Santin  (talk) 08:01, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Very that Davidx5 is related to the above group, judging from behavior. I've blocked their most used IP, and may be able to block more if necessary. –  Luna Santin  (talk) 08:01, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Very that Davidx5 is related to the above group, judging from behavior. I've blocked their most used IP, and may be able to block more if necessary. –  Luna Santin  (talk) 08:01, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Very that Davidx5 is related to the above group, judging from behavior. I've blocked their most used IP, and may be able to block more if necessary. –  Luna Santin  (talk) 08:01, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Very that Davidx5 is related to the above group, judging from behavior. I've blocked their most used IP, and may be able to block more if necessary. –  Luna Santin  (talk) 08:01, 2 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Conclusions

Remaining accounts blocked and tagged. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 11:47, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

11 March 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

These accounts and anons exhibit the same editing pattern of Tngah and his known socks — which includes block evasion, edit warring, disruptive editing, nationalistic POV pushing, additions of copyvio, additions of unsourced text, unexplained removal of sourced text, and personal attacks. They have arrived one after another — usually after an account begins to have complaints. Additionally, he tends to assume that users who disagree with them are racists. (, previous evidence  ) Evidence includes:


 * arbitrary changing of the year 1985 to 1984 (previous evidence)
 * User:Bldonne:
 * User:Dauwa:
 * User:12.20.4.100:
 * User:68.173.88.27:
 * User:108.14.223.41:
 * User:66.108.248.101:
 * User:98.14.217.156:


 * vandalizing/downgrading Italy-related content or defaming/falsifying about Italy in favor of his own Spanish nationalistic POV.
 * User:Bldonne:
 * User:Dauwa:
 * User:12.20.4.100:
 * User:68.173.88.27:
 * User:69.118.47.62:


 * frequently changing of Italy's R1b (Y-DNA) data 60.8 to 50.8 which is not supported by source
 * User:Bldonne:
 * User:Dauwa:
 * User:12.20.4.100:
 * User:74.108.155.197:
 * User:74.108.158.37:
 * User:74.108.160.243:
 * User:74.108.163.13:
 * User:108.14.212.81:
 * User:108.14.214.79:
 * User:108.14.216.242:
 * User:108.21.132.237:


 * ungrammatical changing of the word Spanish to Spaniard
 * User:Bldonne:
 * User:Dauwa:
 * User:12.20.4.100:

Che829 (talk) 01:00, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
 * same editing pattern
 * User:Bldonne:  / User:68.173.90.129:
 * User:Bldonne:  / User:74.108.161.48:
 * User:Bldonne: / User:74.108.163.44:
 * User:Bldonne: / User:108.21.128.43:

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - The master account is too to be checked.  The  Helpful  One  18:01, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
 * While that CU decline was quite correct, sometimes I can throw about some [[Image:Pixie dust.png|16px|link=|alt=]] magic pixie dust and say that it seems to be technically possible that and  are the same person.  Amalthea  15:06, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I am very hesitant to blocks here based on CU evidence even with convincing diffs. The reason being is you have 2 mobile ranges, and a very dynamic ISP. The only static guy is the 12.* (except for maybe 69.118.47.62, which of the top of my head I haven't seen the ISP name before). But we are looking at very heavy collaterial damage if we block some of these ranges. -- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  09:01, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * With no other comments, i'll close this then. -- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  02:08, 11 April 2012 (UTC)