Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tokarro666/Archive

01 September 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

User Tokarro666 created this article which was then changed to a redirect because it failed to meet notability requirements for a standalone article. User Tokarro666 was subsequently warned about creating such articles. Then a new account (F.I.S.Z. Emade) was created to revert the redirect. These two accounts seem linked by editing the same articles.


 * Tokarro666 created the article, it was changed to a redirect per guidelines, and then F.I.S.Z. Emade springs up to revert the redirect. ChakaKongLet's talk about it 15:08, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
 * F.I.S.Z. Emade created the article and within 2 days Tokarro666 is editing it.

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I also noticed that Fru! was created by a third account,, only hours before created it again, so I decided to check and see if there were more sockpuppets. The following accounts are all ✅:


 * It looks like all have been used in violation of the sock puppetry policy; specifically, they are edit warring in favor of each other. Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:24, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I've blocked the socks indefinitely and the master for two weeks for sock puppetry. Closing. Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:25, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

22 September 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Fails the DUCK test with the account. Similar name, the same articles edited, with the same contribution (see "Wrong (Depeche Mode song) ". A CU may be needed in case of the creation of other accounts. Also, if confirmed Gospel (Lao Che album) needs to be deleted per WP:G5. Tb hotch .™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it!  See terms and conditions.  00:00, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Sock is ✅. I discussed the ANI thread with some others on IRC, and helped suggest a course of action. I'll defer to a a patrolling admin for what action should be taken regarding the master. Sock blocked indef and tagged. NativeForeigner Talk 16:56, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I've blocked and tagged the master. Although the account has not been used since August 31, the previous blocks and continued use of puppets mandate an indefinite block. Bbb23 (talk) 18:59, 22 September 2013 (UTC)