Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tomtasget/Archive

15 November 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

There are two sides bringing their legal disputes into Wikipedia. Before I hand out blocks for all sides, I'd like to know if socking is going on. The two editors are on the anti-Repetti side. Tomtasget has nominated Zude (Repetti's company) for deletion and uploaded legal documents,  and added puffery to Jeff Brown (Repetti's opponent). SeigeBrown has created Jeff Brown, voted in the AFD, and referred to similar legal documents on the talk page. Neil N  talk to me 16:53, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Done. --Neil N  talk to me 17:33, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:
 * 1) At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
 * 2) At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
 * 3) In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this.  Vanjagenije   (talk)  17:00, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
 * - per provided evidence.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  17:39, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
 * The two accounts are ✅. I've blocked and tagged both. I'm not done yet, so please leave the SPI in a checking status., I've indefinitely blocked the master. If you think that's too harsh, you can feel free to reduce it. If you do reduce it, you should also remove the tag from the master's userpage. I'll be back with more a bit later today.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:26, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Let me put it this way - if you hadn't indeffed the master I would've asked if I could do so. --Neil N  talk to me 19:29, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I also think a block is in order for Srepetti (the other side) for outing, attempting outing, and probable socking but would appreciate your advice. --Neil N  talk to me 19:38, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Do you mean probable socking by the IP (their edits and Srepetti's edits are suppressed)? If there's no named account, you're probably in a better position than I to decide whether to block Srepetti. It doesn't look like an indefinite block would be a loss to the encyclopedia. :-) --Bbb23 (talk) 22:01, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I've now completed the CU and have nothing more to add. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:00, 16 November 2015 (UTC)